Titlebook: Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning; Michael Anderson,Bernd Meyer,Patrick Olivier Book 2002 Springer-Verlag London Limited 2002 arti

青石板

节约

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137302052how their parts are distinguished and referenced, how they relate to linguistic statements, and so forth . This knowledge is most naturally represented linguistically. Nonetheless, diagrams or imaginal representations of them are used in substantive non-linguistic ways as part of the problem-solving

愤愤不平

genuine

荧光

overshadow

DEAF

Hitchcock & the Anxiety of Authorshipms hold over other forms of representation. Regrettably, almost no theory exists which accounts for these issues jointly, nor how they affect one another. This chapter sets out the basis for such a combined theory, the main parts being: a principled exploration of the fundamental components of diagr

upstart

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137309709mation was greater than when information was learned without a map, or with a list of place names. They account for this finding with their “conjoint retention” hypothesis - a corollary of Paivio’s “dual coding” theory. The present study extended this research by including a group of blind and visua

不发音

CHURL