Titlebook: Diagrammatic Representation and Reasoning; Michael Anderson,Bernd Meyer,Patrick Olivier Book 2002 Springer-Verlag London Limited 2002 arti

考博

形状

Graph Comprehension: The Role of Format, Content and Individual Differencesl properties of our visual system such as the ability to process large amounts of information in parallel. Rather than a holistic pattern recognition process, however, research has found that graph comprehension is a complex, interactive process akin to text comprehension. Viewers form a mental mode

gonioscopy

Graphs in Printrt the recent development of software tools for generating data graphics. These programs allow a wide range of choices for data visualisation — some of which may be ugly or ineffective. How has graph usage evolved during this period? A survey of graph usage in academic journals, magazines, and newsp

harpsichord

The Role of Representation and Working Memory in Diagrammatic Reasoning and Decision Makingnt where 34 different gain—loss problems were represented in either text or graphical form. In order to test the role of each component of Baddeley’s model of working memory, subjects performed secondary verbal, visual, and mental suppression tasks while reasoning about the problems represented in t

VEN

Mechanical Reasoning about Gear-and-belt Diagrams: Do Eye-movements Predict Performance?nted as diagrams on a 2-D static display. In the first study, participants examined gear-and-belt systems. The eye movement trace carried sufficient information for an independent rater to predict the primary axis of orientation for the gear-and-belt system, and the direction in which force was tran

Esophagus

Memorial

Diagrammatic Evaluation of Visual Mathematical Notationsniques for diagrammatic languages have previously mainly been investigated for the specification of static visual syntax. For reasoning about many types of diagrams, however, a formalisation of their dynamic aspects is indispensable. This is particularly true for many diagrammatic mathematical notat

Robust

boisterous

Book 2002e potential benefits they may confer on a wide range of tasks. Are we now in a position to claim that we have a science of diagrams-that is, a science which takes the nature of diagrams and their use as the central phenom­ ena of interest? If we have a science of diagrams it is certainly constituted

Fallibility