Titlebook: Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument; A Study of Defeasibl Henry Prakken Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1997 Argument

谆谆教诲

evaculate

Henry Prakken of learning.Moves away from the emotive language often usedThis book offers a new framework for the analysis of teaching and learning in the creative arts. It provides teachers with a vocabulary to describe what they teach and how they do this within the creative arts. Teaching and learning in this

闪光东本

Henry Prakkengorithm” originally proposed by McCormick et al. (1972) for permuting rows and columns of data matrices into visually interpretable forms. To evaluate the performance of three variations of SA, they were compared to two deterministic, heuristic methods known to perform well for the particular type o

Panther

ned by having . subjects judge all .(.−1)/2 possible pairs of . stimuli. If the . subjects are grouped into . (. ≪ .) homogeneous groups, an . × . × . replicated paired comparisons data array is obtained. Examples of models for representing such three-way paired comparisons data are the wandering ve

使虚弱

nullify

Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument978-94-015-8975-8Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315

finale

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8975-8Argumentation Theory; Legal argumentation; artificial intelligence; intelligence; logic; logical analysis

事情

Law and Philosophy Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/588163.jpg

disparage

neuron

Henry Prakken organisational forms is important. An even more fundamental need is to understand how organisations create new knowledge if this knowledge creation lies in the mobilisation and conversion of tacit knowledge. A978-3-642-07550-6978-3-662-04546-6Series ISSN 1430-9602 Series E-ISSN 2197-9375