设为首页收藏本站
开启辅助访问 切换到窄版

 找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步，快速开始

扫一扫，访问微社区

  • ALL
  • Journals
  • Books

派博传思国际中心 »期刊书目

› BOOKS
› BOOKS with Alphabet L (La, Lb,Lc, Ld, Le…... )

12345下一页
返回列表

Titlebook: Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument; A Study of Defeasibl Henry Prakken Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1997 Argument

[复制链接]
查看: 17474|回复: 48
发表于 2025-3-21 19:15:14 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument
副标题A Study of Defeasibl
编辑Henry Prakken
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/589/588163/588163.mp4
丛书名称Law and Philosophy Library
图书封面Titlebook: Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument; A Study of Defeasibl Henry Prakken Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1997 Argument
描述This book is a revised and extended version of my PhD Thesis ‘Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument‘, which I defended on 14 January 1993 at the Free University Amsterdam. The first five chapters of the thesis have remained almost completely unchanged but the other chapters have undergone considerable revision and expansion. Most importantly, I have replaced the formal argument-based system of the old Chapters 6, 7 and 8 with a revised and extended system, whieh I have developed during the last three years in collaboration with Giovanni Sartor. Apart from some technical improvements, the main additions to the old system are the enriehment of its language with a nonprovability operator, and the ability to formalise reasoning about preference criteria. Moreover, the new system has a very intuitive dialectieal form, as opposed to the rather unintuitive fixed-point appearance of the old system. Another important revision is the split of the old Chapter 9 into two new chapters. The oldSection 9. 1 on related research has been updated and expanded into a whole chapter, while the rest of the old chapter is now in revised form in Chapter 10. This chapter also contains two new contribu
出版日期Book 1997
关键词Argumentation Theory; Legal argumentation; artificial intelligence; intelligence; logic; logical analysis
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8975-8
isbn_softcover978-90-481-4928-5
isbn_ebook978-94-015-8975-8Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media B.V. 1997
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument网络公开度




书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument被引频次




书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument被引频次学科排名




书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument年度引用




书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument年度引用学科排名




书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument读者反馈




书目名称Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
1.jpg
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics
2.jpg
 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty
3.jpg
 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory
4.jpg
 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance
5.jpg
 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage
您所在的用户组没有投票权限
遮阳伞
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-21 21:33:34 | 显示全部楼层
The Role of Logic in Legal Reasoning,easoning. I shall do so mainly by discussing some objections to logical methods which can be found in legal philosophy and AI-and-law. Some of them are an application to the legal domain of more general criticism of logic discussed in Chapter 1. Section 2.1 briefly discusses some basic misunderstand
引起
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 02:03:42 | 显示全部楼层
The Need for New Logical Tools,ods, for which reason new logical tools are needed. In this chapter I shall in more detail go into the causes of the limitations and the nature of the needed tools. A first cause is the rule-guided rather than rule-governed nature of legal reasoning. Because of the open, unpredictable nature of the
狂乱
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 06:28:50 | 显示全部楼层
Logics for Nonmonotonic Reasoning,ious chapter two basic motivations for using nonmonotonic forms of reasoning. The first is common to all domains of common-sense reasoning. In solving a problem people do not always have enough information to make a safe step towards the conclusion; instead, they often have to jump to conclusions by
adulterant
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 11:24:10 | 显示全部楼层
Obsessed
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 14:39:31 | 显示全部楼层
Preferring the Most Specific Argument,e solutions to a problem and . the exceptional one if it exists. In this method exceptions can be left implicit: no use has to be made of exception or applicability clauses, since exceptions are identified as a result of the choice. As already mentioned in Chapter 3, when applied to legislation this
Neuralgia
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 17:15:07 | 显示全部楼层
Reasoning with Inconsistent Information,nt since, as noted in Chapter 3, the information with which a lawyer is confronted is often contradictory. However, the relevance of this chapter is not restricted to the legal domain; in other domains of common-sense reasoning people are also often confronted with conflicting sources of information
conceal
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 23:04:32 | 显示全部楼层
Reasoning about Priority Relations,e expressed as an ordering on rules. However, apart from specificity almost nothing has yet been said about the possible sources of the priorities. For some time in AI the (often implicit) hope has been that the sources of these priorities are of a general, domain independent nature. As a consequenc
勉强
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-23 01:31:11 | 显示全部楼层
Systems for Defeasible Argumentation,t, Section 9.1 gives a conceptual description in general terms of the notion of an argumentation system, followed by a discussion in Section 9.2 of the main systems of this kind that have so far been developed. After that, Section 9.3, discusses some other recent developments, which are not argument
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-23 06:19:32 | 显示全部楼层
魅力
回复

举报

下一页 »
12345下一页
返回列表
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-9 13:03
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表