Titlebook: Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument; A Study of Defeasibl Henry Prakken Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1997 Argument

pulmonary-edema

单调性

健谈的人

前奏曲

Representing Explicit Exceptions,ith inconsistent information, which is the second major topic of this book. Therefore, Chapter 6 can not only be regarded as the second chapter on dealing with exceptions, but also as the first chapter on inconsistency handling. Chapters 7 and 8 then continue the discussion of this topic, and in one

chance

Contort

Conclusion, for showing that defeasible reasoning and reasoning with inconsistent information can be logically analyzed should also not go to me; my research has been a contribution to developments initiated by others, partly by applying these developments to the legal domain and partly by adding something new

GLUT

Book 1997 system. Another important revision is the split of the old Chapter 9 into two new chapters. The oldSection 9. 1 on related research has been updated and expanded into a whole chapter, while the rest of the old chapter is now in revised form in Chapter 10. This chapter also contains two new contribu

hysterectomy

遵循的规范

Introduction,nded result consists of formal-logical foundations of computer systems performing legal reasoning tasks. However, since legal philosophy does not provide ready-made insights that can serve as such foundations, this book also contributes to legal philosophy, in further developing these insights.