找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Epistemic Fluency and Professional Education; Innovation, Knowledg Lina Markauskaite,Peter Goodyear Book 2017 Springer Science+Business Med

[复制链接]
楼主: 重要
发表于 2025-3-28 14:55:55 | 显示全部楼层
Erhebungen: Voraussetzungen und Intentionen,nowledge each produces and the skills needed to play each game – we identify six main types of professional epistemic games and illustrate how they are played in professional work and learning. But we also note that these games are rarely played just one at a time. They are often woven together into one gradually unfolding situated activity.
发表于 2025-3-28 22:30:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 02:20:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 04:07:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 11:11:41 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 11:40:57 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-91710-2mbine different epistemic qualities. We illustrate these qualities and argue that they provide important bridges between ‘learning to do’ and ‘learning to understand’ – thereby underpinning epistemic fluency.
发表于 2025-3-29 19:25:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 21:59:29 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,rview of the core conceptual concerns of the book, tracing their development across the 19 chapters that follow. It also provides a summary of the body of empirical research on which we draw when illustrating our arguments.
发表于 2025-3-30 01:26:38 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-30 04:37:48 | 显示全部楼层
Professional Knowledge and Knowing in Shared Epistemic Spaces: The Person-Plus Perspective, knowledgeable action and innovation, traditional views of practice – as shared cultural, social and material phenomena – need to be extended at least one level downwards: to include human skills and the mind.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-7 15:53
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表