找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Epistemic Fluency and Professional Education; Innovation, Knowledg Lina Markauskaite,Peter Goodyear Book 2017 Springer Science+Business Med

[复制链接]
楼主: 重要
发表于 2025-3-25 06:28:46 | 显示全部楼层
Messung von Vertrauen in F&E-Kooperationen,nowledge work and knowledgeable action are constitutively entangled with embodied practices in the material and social worlds. We show how matter matters in professional work, and how a ‘socially extended mind’ enables thinking with others. This entangling of mind, body and world raises some difficu
发表于 2025-3-25 10:24:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 13:20:56 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3587-8d accounts of discourse; both have to be combined in a satisfactory account of epistemic thought and action. We use the case study of preservice teachers’ planning to explain the nature of epistemic resources and to introduce the notion of ‘framing’. Framing is a way of describing how people make se
发表于 2025-3-25 19:08:53 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49463-9hat each can offer to those professional educators who are looking to teach for epistemic fluency. These educational approaches come from a range of sources – not just from professional education. All these approaches focus on fine-tuning learners’ intelligent sensitivity to the critical features of
发表于 2025-3-25 21:51:50 | 显示全部楼层
Professional Epistemic Games,nowledge each produces and the skills needed to play each game – we identify six main types of professional epistemic games and illustrate how they are played in professional work and learning. But we also note that these games are rarely played just one at a time. They are often woven together into one gradually unfolding situated activity.
发表于 2025-3-26 03:50:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 04:46:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 11:27:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 14:10:16 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-82565-1we want to argue that professional workers – and those who help them prepare for the professions – can benefit from being able to consciously distinguish between different kinds of epistemic tools and to think and talk about the tasks for which each is best suited.
发表于 2025-3-26 19:57:15 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-7 15:42
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表