Titlebook: Coleridge, Schiller and Aesthetic Education; Michael John Kooy Book 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 20

children

书目名称Coleridge, Schiller and Aesthetic Education影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Coleridge, Schiller and Aesthetic Education影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Coleridge, Schiller and Aesthetic Education网络公开度




书目名称Coleridge, Schiller and Aesthetic Education网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Coleridge, Schiller and Aesthetic Education被引频次




书目名称Coleridge, Schiller and Aesthetic Education被引频次学科排名




书目名称Coleridge, Schiller and Aesthetic Education年度引用




书目名称Coleridge, Schiller and Aesthetic Education年度引用学科排名




书目名称Coleridge, Schiller and Aesthetic Education读者反馈




书目名称Coleridge, Schiller and Aesthetic Education读者反馈学科排名

杂役

他很灵活

Coleridge and Weimar Classicism,1798, he seriously considered setting off straight away for Weimar – where he knew he would find Wieland, Herder, Goethe and the visiting Schiller – but was put off by complaints from other English travellers about the high cost of getting there (., I, 340). In the end he settled on the town of Ratz

Assault

英寸

剥削

剥削

Aesthetic Education in , and the Lectures on Literature,tion. The next is to postulate an anthropology asserting that to be human in the fullest sense is to be ‘at play’. Here the moral, and in due course the political, purpose of freedom is made explicit. How Coleridge’s claim, that art leads indirectly to moral benefit, draws on Schiller’s argument for

DEAF

,Coleridge’s ‘ Aesthetic State’,nt personal freedoms preserved in the constitution. But that is not to say that ‘despotism’ was any sort of solution. Coleridge’s point is that the liberal market economy deals only in monetary value and so cannot take into its calculations the worth of aesthetic artefacts – with predictably disastr

Calibrate

保守

Epilogue: , and History,case for a historical connection between Coleridge and Schiller. Through his first-hand knowledge of contemporary German philosophy and literature and, more specifically, his reading of many Schiller texts and the translating of ., Coleridge knew of Schiller’s argument for ‘aesthetic education’ and