Titlebook: Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal; Proceedings of the F Hugo Tristram Engelhardt,Stuart F. Spicker,Bernard Conference proceedings 197

Occipital-Lobe

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468888the relation between judgment and evidence. Now it seems wholly natural to have such an interaction and to have a conference that focuses on clinical judgment, with physicians and philosophers doing their best to interact and to understand each other’s problems and methods.

Nebulous

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409300ual importance of patients’ subjective experience with objective, measurable facts of medicine. Further, Dr. Weed gives excellent examples of the kind of profiles of patients’ personal and social lives that should be included in any complete medical record.

寄生虫

The Subjective in Clinical Judgmentual importance of patients’ subjective experience with objective, measurable facts of medicine. Further, Dr. Weed gives excellent examples of the kind of profiles of patients’ personal and social lives that should be included in any complete medical record.

Ferritin

Clinical Judgmentieve the latter at conferences by telling jokes. Here I shall endeavor to substitute outrage for amusement. Nothing keeps one awake like nursing an outrage. As to the task of surveying the issues, I shall do that relatively briefly since my fellow contributor to this section, Dr. Elstein, will be sa

或者发神韵

Human Factors in Clinical Judgment: Discussion of Scriven’s ‘Clinical Judgment’f clinical versus statistical prediction and with the implications of the well replicated research finding that clinical judgments can be reproduced or even improved upon by simple statistical formulas derived from a representative sample of prior judgments [11]. This appears to be a puzzling, contr