找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal; Proceedings of the F Hugo Tristram Engelhardt,Stuart F. Spicker,Bernard Conference proceedings 197

[复制链接]
查看: 34476|回复: 54
发表于 2025-3-21 17:10:13 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal
副标题Proceedings of the F
编辑Hugo Tristram Engelhardt,Stuart F. Spicker,Bernard
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal; Proceedings of the F Hugo Tristram Engelhardt,Stuart F. Spicker,Bernard Conference proceedings 197
描述Over a period of a year, the symposium on clinical judgment has taken shape as a volume devoted to the analysis of how knowledge claims are framed in medicine and how choices of treatment are made. We hope it will afford the reader, whether layman, physician or philosopher, a useful perspective on the process of knowing what occurs in medicine; and that the results of the dis­ cussions at the Fifth Symposium on Philosophy and Medicine will lead to a better understanding of how philosophy and medicine can usefully challenge each other. As the interchange between physicians, philosophers, nurses and psychologists recorded in the major papers, the commentaries and the round table discussion shows, these issues are truly interdisciplinary. In particular, they have shown that members of the health care professions have much to learn about themselves from philosophers as well as much of interest to engage philosophers. By making the structure of medical reasoning more apparent to its users, philosophers can show health care practitioners how better to master clinical judgment and how better to focus it towards the goods and values medicine wishes to pursue. Becoming clearer about the pro
出版日期Conference proceedings 19791st edition
关键词anatomy; diagnosis; health; logic; medicine; philosophy; psychology
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9399-0
isbn_softcover978-94-009-9401-0
isbn_ebook978-94-009-9399-0
copyrightD. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1979
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal网络公开度




书目名称Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal被引频次




书目名称Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal被引频次学科排名




书目名称Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal年度引用




书目名称Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal年度引用学科排名




书目名称Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal读者反馈




书目名称Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-22 00:14:13 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612587f clinical versus statistical prediction and with the implications of the well replicated research finding that clinical judgments can be reproduced or even improved upon by simple statistical formulas derived from a representative sample of prior judgments [11]. This appears to be a puzzling, contr
发表于 2025-3-22 04:22:14 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612587d sciences appears obvious, and pigeon-holing diagnosis a matter of course. Diagnosis looks to be more like physiology and psychology than like music, painting, or short story writing. If important questions are supposed to be hard and require considerable care in answering, our initial query does n
发表于 2025-3-22 06:59:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:53:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:51:20 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612587sicians, ought to take to heart. When he explicitly draws the moral, however, he shows a certain degree of diffidence. He warns us (p. 80) that his views admittedly sound disillusioning and even pessimistic; and that he blushes ([1], p. 82) at the necessity of making a point that must seem obvious,
发表于 2025-3-22 18:15:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 21:15:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:52:26 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468888a way which would provoke philosophical comment. Having now studied Ernan McMullin’s commentary on my paper I think I may claim to have achieved a certain measure of success in this endeavor, although McMullin’s comments are, I must admit, not quite what I expected.
发表于 2025-3-23 09:11:22 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137468888ture of clinical judgment. The philosophers would have been unwilling or unprepared to think about matters that on the surface seemed far removed from classical philosophical problems. Physicians on their part would have been wary of entering into the labyrinth of methodological issues dealing with
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-23 15:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表