找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal; Proceedings of the F Hugo Tristram Engelhardt,Stuart F. Spicker,Bernard Conference proceedings 197

[复制链接]
楼主: EVOKE
发表于 2025-3-26 21:43:55 | 显示全部楼层
Comments on Pellegrino’s ‘Anatomy of Clinical Judgments’ctic, ethics, art and rhetoric” in the spirit of the Aristotelian division of the sciences, a division, in my view, almost wholly inappropriate, in the terms in which Aristotle made it, to any modern philosophical discussion of the nature of science or disciplines like clinical medicine that exist i
发表于 2025-3-27 02:11:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 07:31:04 | 显示全部楼层
of interest to engage philosophers. By making the structure of medical reasoning more apparent to its users, philosophers can show health care practitioners how better to master clinical judgment and how better to focus it towards the goods and values medicine wishes to pursue. Becoming clearer about the pro978-94-009-9401-0978-94-009-9399-0
发表于 2025-3-27 13:29:00 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230612587rom an information-processing perspective, and second, by critically examining the research model that produced this finding My concern will be, then, with the psychological processes of clinical judgment and with ascertaining what research on clinical judgment has actually studied. The overall thru
发表于 2025-3-27 16:17:15 | 显示全部楼层
Russia‘s Oil Barons and Metal Magnatesctic, ethics, art and rhetoric” in the spirit of the Aristotelian division of the sciences, a division, in my view, almost wholly inappropriate, in the terms in which Aristotle made it, to any modern philosophical discussion of the nature of science or disciplines like clinical medicine that exist i
发表于 2025-3-27 17:49:37 | 显示全部楼层
framed in medicine and how choices of treatment are made. We hope it will afford the reader, whether layman, physician or philosopher, a useful perspective on the process of knowing what occurs in medicine; and that the results of the dis­ cussions at the Fifth Symposium on Philosophy and Medicine w
发表于 2025-3-28 01:24:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 02:12:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 07:49:52 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409300 by Eric Cassell in his ‘The Subjective in Clinical Judgment’ [1] are not philosophical in nature. Rather, they take the form of a general essay in psychology; and so my comments on Dr. Cassell’s discussion of them will be from one in the position of an outsider looking in.
发表于 2025-3-28 11:13:33 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-23 13:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表