找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology; Deconstructing Darwi Richard G. Delisle,Maurizio Esposito,David Ceccare Book 2024 The Editor(s)

[复制链接]
楼主: PEL
发表于 2025-3-23 11:04:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 14:54:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 18:41:13 | 显示全部楼层
The Strange Story of Mosaic Evolutioncroevolutionary change. Less known is that this expression was coined by Gavin de Beer in 1954. I move from the philological symptom of the frequent oblivion of de Beer’s authorship of this notion to investigate the history of its reception by G.G. Simpson and E. Mayr in the context of the “hardenin
发表于 2025-3-23 22:31:50 | 显示全部楼层
Deconstructing the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis: Do We Need a New Theory of Evolution?mptions—to highlight its shortcomings. In so doing, I promote new representations of evolution not characterized by “extending” or “expanding” the Modern Synthesis framework. To emphasize the shortcomings of the Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, I propose a hypothetical new theory of evolution—which
发表于 2025-3-24 03:32:35 | 显示全部楼层
Deconstructing and Reconstructing the History of Evolutionary Thought: An Agenda for a “Post-Darwinit have haunted many previous histories: the idea that, before Darwin, most scholars believed in a static world populated of “essential types” and the related idea that Darwin is the undiscussed protagonist of any general history of evolutionary thought. I also claim that, while many scholars have hi
发表于 2025-3-24 06:44:32 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2024ontradictory historiographies. With time, it seems, scholars discover new approaches to study topics, thus questioning old concepts, traditions, periodizations and historical labels. Apparently, this has not been the case in evolutionary thought. In that area, the main historiographic labels such as
发表于 2025-3-24 11:42:40 | 显示全部楼层
“Reformist” and “Radical” Historiographies Behind and Beyond the Unity and Disunity of the Evolutionhe history of evolutionary thought. Notably, it is an occasion that calls for imagining new historiographies where the traditional place of Darwin and Darwinism in the history of life science is questioned, rediscussed, and reevaluated.
发表于 2025-3-24 14:57:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 21:28:06 | 显示全部楼层
Richard G. Delisle,Maurizio Esposito,David CeccareProvides a critical re-evaluation of the Evolutionary Synthesis.Assesses the state of evolutionary biology today and opens up new ways of thinking.Also addresses historiographical, sociological and ep
发表于 2025-3-25 00:58:06 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-5 18:48
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表