找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology; Deconstructing Darwi Richard G. Delisle,Maurizio Esposito,David Ceccare Book 2024 The Editor(s)

[复制链接]
查看: 41690|回复: 53
发表于 2025-3-21 19:53:08 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology
副标题Deconstructing Darwi
编辑Richard G. Delisle,Maurizio Esposito,David Ceccare
视频video
概述Provides a critical re-evaluation of the Evolutionary Synthesis.Assesses the state of evolutionary biology today and opens up new ways of thinking.Also addresses historiographical, sociological and ep
图书封面Titlebook: Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology; Deconstructing Darwi Richard G. Delisle,Maurizio Esposito,David Ceccare Book 2024 The Editor(s)
描述.It is not uncommon to see in major areas of research concerned with science that historical studies are accompanied by the rise of complementary or contradictory historiographies. With time, it seems, scholars discover new approaches to study topics, thus questioning old concepts, traditions, periodizations and historical labels. Apparently, this has not been the case in evolutionary thought. In that area, the main historiographic labels such as Darwinian Revolution, Eclipse of Darwinism, and Modern Synthesis have been in place and largely uncontested for about 50 years. Such labels seem to work as irrefutable, and often hidden, premises of many historical reconstructions, philosophical analyses, and scientific conceptualizations...This volume aims to move beyond this state of affair, opening new thinking avenues by revisiting the traditional historiography and laying the groundwork for establishing a “new historiography” that considers the intertwined threads that compose evolutionary biology. Notably, evolutionary studies seem to have been marked by the tension between unification attempts and the proliferation of approaches, methodologies, and styles of thinking. As the contrib
出版日期Book 2024
关键词Darwinism; Evolutionary Theory; Evolutionary Biology; Charles Darwin; Modern Synthesis; Extended Evolutio
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42629-2
isbn_softcover978-3-031-42631-5
isbn_ebook978-3-031-42629-2
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology网络公开度




书目名称Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology被引频次




书目名称Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology被引频次学科排名




书目名称Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology年度引用




书目名称Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology年度引用学科排名




书目名称Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology读者反馈




书目名称Unity and Disunity in Evolutionary Biology读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:26:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 00:50:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:14:58 | 显示全部楼层
Constructing, Deconstructing, and Reconstructing. On “Darwinism” and “Darwinisms,” with Some Disparaandoned? Or is a new synthesis emerging? What does “Darwinism” mean today? A historian can only say that things were not much different in the past. Biology was pluralistic before and after Darwin. Darwinism was a multifaceted collective movement, and the term meant many things to many people, inclu
发表于 2025-3-22 09:51:28 | 显示全部楼层
The Evolution of “Darwinism”: Up Close and Personalobfuscated the central persistent problem Darwin’s natural selection theory has faced ever since 1859, namely its failure to explain or account for macroevolution and the origin of higher taxa. It also “deconstructed” the standard story and explored the actual disunity underlying the apparent “unity
发表于 2025-3-22 15:40:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 19:54:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 22:01:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:47:48 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:16:18 | 显示全部楼层
Typology/Population Distinction and Its Role in the Marginalization of Nineteenth-Century Non-Darwinhodology employed to establish a connection between essentialism and typology. Specifically, the study analyzes the methods of two major proponents of this thesis: Ernst Mayr and David Hull. The typology/population dichotomy, initially proposed by Mayr, has significantly influenced the historical na
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-5 18:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表