找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: The Popper-Carnap Controversy; Alex C. Michalos Book 1971 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1971 Karl R. Popper.Rudolf Carnap.growt

[复制链接]
查看: 15107|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 18:30:06 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称The Popper-Carnap Controversy
编辑Alex C. Michalos
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: The Popper-Carnap Controversy;  Alex C. Michalos Book 1971 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1971 Karl R. Popper.Rudolf Carnap.growt
描述1 In 1954 Karl Popper published an article attempting to show that the identification of the quantitative concept degree of confirmation with the quantitative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen­ bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper‘s intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months later Y. Bar-Hillel published an article attempting to show that no serious error had been committed (particularly by Carnap) and that the problem introduced by Popper was simply a "verbal one. "3 Popper replied immediately that "Dr. Bar-Hillel forces me [Popper] now to criticize Carnap‘s theory further," and he [Popper] introduced further objections which, if accepted, destroy Carnap‘s theory. 4 About eight years after this exchange took place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad­ miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and
出版日期Book 1971
关键词Karl R; Popper; Rudolf Carnap; growth; probability; singular
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3048-9
isbn_softcover978-90-247-5127-3
isbn_ebook978-94-010-3048-9
copyrightMartinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1971
The information of publication is updating

书目名称The Popper-Carnap Controversy影响因子(影响力)




书目名称The Popper-Carnap Controversy影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称The Popper-Carnap Controversy网络公开度




书目名称The Popper-Carnap Controversy网络公开度学科排名




书目名称The Popper-Carnap Controversy被引频次




书目名称The Popper-Carnap Controversy被引频次学科排名




书目名称The Popper-Carnap Controversy年度引用




书目名称The Popper-Carnap Controversy年度引用学科排名




书目名称The Popper-Carnap Controversy读者反馈




书目名称The Popper-Carnap Controversy读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:29:13 | 显示全部楼层
Book 1971titative concept degree of probability is a serious error. The error was presumably committed by J. M. Keynes, H. Reichen­ bach and R. Carnap. 2 It was Popper‘s intention then, to expose the error and to introduce an explicatum for the prescientific concept of degree of confirmation. A few months la
发表于 2025-3-22 01:19:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 06:41:46 | 显示全部楼层
place I was in graduate school at the University of Chicago in search of a topic for a doctoral dissertation. An investigation of the issues involved in this exchange seemed to be ideal for me because I had (and still have) a great ad­ miration for the work of both Carnap and Popper. A thoroughly revised and978-90-247-5127-3978-94-010-3048-9
发表于 2025-3-22 08:44:09 | 显示全部楼层
978-90-247-5127-3Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands 1971
发表于 2025-3-22 14:14:52 | 显示全部楼层
http://image.papertrans.cn/t/image/917316.jpg
发表于 2025-3-22 18:50:03 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-3048-9Karl R; Popper; Rudolf Carnap; growth; probability; singular
发表于 2025-3-23 00:54:15 | 显示全部楼层
The Principles of Divorce in the Qur’ānt exercised by husbands or wives, but never mentions repudiation. Divorce is by mutual consent, at the request of the husband, or at the request of the wife (.). Before Islam, divorce, as repudiation, was the right of husbands, exercised when and as often as they pleased. In divorces initiated by hu
发表于 2025-3-23 04:14:35 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:50:30 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-20 20:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表