Titlebook: Superior Beings. If They Exist, How Would We Know?; Game-Theoretic Impli Steven J. Brams Book 2007Latest edition Springer-Verlag New York 2

采纳

进入

Introduction,me linkages that might not be apparent at first glance. This not only serves the purpose of establishing ties to relevant research in different fields but also helps to embed the present work in a research tradition, somewhat in eclipse, that I think still deserves to be part of the intellectual landscape.

粘土

Omnipotence: Moving and Staying Power,The resolution of the first paradox of omniscience in Chapter 4, via the theory of moves, was thoroughly secular. It generally favored the stronger or quicker player, in a particular sense, and thus could be viewed as unfair to the other player, though he always obtained at least his security level in a game.

inhibit

Steven J. BramsExamines theology and the idea of a superior being in the context of game theory.Excellent reviews of the first edition from Nature, New Scientist and prominent game theorists

橡子

ibutes or transfers resources among them until no further transfer would leave their shares of the total resources more equal’ (Dworkin, 1981a, p. 186). He later clarifies that equal shares are best interpreted in terms of what he regards as two widely held intuitions about justice. The first is tha

枯萎将要

畏缩

discipline and affects how non-specialists come to view the world of economic reality.’ Through his career’s work, and especially through his writing in ‘The Nature of the Firm’ and ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Coase has had such an influence, and in the process has secured a permanent place in th

amorphous

不足的东西

BYRE