找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Superior Beings; If They Exist, How W Steven J. Brams Book 1983 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983 Forth.Mathematica.Natural.eXi

[复制链接]
查看: 42464|回复: 41
发表于 2025-3-21 19:43:01 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Superior Beings
副标题If They Exist, How W
编辑Steven J. Brams
视频video
图书封面Titlebook: Superior Beings; If They Exist, How W Steven J. Brams Book 1983 Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983 Forth.Mathematica.Natural.eXi
描述The central question I pose in this book is: If there existed a supe­ rior being who possessed the supernatural qualities of omni­ science, omnipotence, immortality, and incomprehensibility, how would he/she act differently from us, and would these differences be knowable? (ßecause God, the superior being in the Judeo­ Christian tradition, is generally described as a male, I shall hence­ forth use the masculine pronoun form for convenience, but I intend no invidious gender distinctions, whether applied to super­ natural or natural beings.l Theologians, philosophers of religion, and erudite scholars in other disciplines have addressed this and related questions before, but their answers, generally speaking, have not been informed by any systematic or rigorous theory. I believe the mathematical theory of games, which has little to do with the frivolity and playfulness we normally associate with games, provides a powerful tool for clarifying the key theo­ logical concepts in my central question and drawing out their implications in games played between human and superior beings. I am fully aware that not everybody will agree that omni­ science, omnipotence, immortality, and incomprehe
出版日期Book 1983
关键词Forth; Mathematica; Natural; eXist; form; game theory; games; tool
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1807-2
isbn_softcover978-1-4757-1809-6
isbn_ebook978-1-4757-1807-2
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media New York 1983
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Superior Beings影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Superior Beings影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Superior Beings网络公开度




书目名称Superior Beings网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Superior Beings被引频次




书目名称Superior Beings被引频次学科排名




书目名称Superior Beings年度引用




书目名称Superior Beings年度引用学科排名




书目名称Superior Beings读者反馈




书目名称Superior Beings读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:31:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 01:24:11 | 显示全部楼层
Steven J. Brams ist eine Folge des Zusammenwirkens von negativen Auswirkungen der sozialen Lage der Elterngenerationen auf die Bildungs- und Berufsperspektiven ihrer Kinder mit historischer und gegenwärtiger Diskriminierung. Diskriminierung in der Vergangenheit hat zu massiven Benachteiligungen geführt, die auch u
发表于 2025-3-22 08:03:40 | 显示全部楼层
Steven J. Bramsen des Zusammenbruches und unter der verbissenen Gegnerschaft der oligarchischen Lakonisten in Athen die Erinnerung an den Staat des Perikles mutig heraufbeschwor. Die Erfüllung dieser Ehrenpflicht kann jedoch nie darin gesehen werden, nun mehr oder weniger leichtfertig zu übersehen, daß auch der Si
发表于 2025-3-22 09:48:44 | 显示全部楼层
Steven J. Bramsh als selbständiges Staatswesen in einer völlig verwandelten Welt nicht mehr behaupten konnte. Anderthalb Dezennien zuvor (148) war Makedonien römische Provinz geworden; die Zerreißung des Landes in vier lebensunfähige Kleinstaaten hatte sich allen Kontrollen und Bemühungen zum Trotz als Fehlschlag
发表于 2025-3-22 16:07:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:36:17 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction,me linkages that might not be apparent at first glance. This not only serves the purpose of establishing ties to relevant research in different fields but also helps to embed the present work in a research tradition, somewhat in eclipse, that I think still deserves to be part of the intellectual landscape.
发表于 2025-3-22 22:08:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 01:35:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 09:17:35 | 显示全部楼层
Omnipotence: Moving and Staying Power,The resolution of the first paradox of omniscience in Chapter 4, via the theory of moves, was thoroughly secular. It generally favored the stronger or quicker player, in a particular sense, and thus could be viewed as unfair to the other player, though he always obtained at least his security level in a game.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-5 23:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表