Titlebook: Service-Learning in Theory and Practice; The Future of Commun Dan W. Butin Book 2010 Dan W. Butin 2010 e-learning.education.higher educatio

EVOKE

书目名称Service-Learning in Theory and Practice影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Service-Learning in Theory and Practice影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Service-Learning in Theory and Practice网络公开度




书目名称Service-Learning in Theory and Practice网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Service-Learning in Theory and Practice被引频次




书目名称Service-Learning in Theory and Practice被引频次学科排名




书目名称Service-Learning in Theory and Practice年度引用




书目名称Service-Learning in Theory and Practice年度引用学科排名




书目名称Service-Learning in Theory and Practice读者反馈




书目名称Service-Learning in Theory and Practice读者反馈学科排名

缩短

Infiltrate

Incisor

Feckless

Conceptualizing Service-Learning chapter focusing on carefully and analytically conceptualizing what service-learning is (and is not), laying the groundwork for the analyses in the rest of the book, and drawing out some implications for the field of service-learning in general.

亲爱

The Possibilities of Service-Learningning are self-undermining. Thus all modes of service-learning not only have external limits; they have internal limits as well. And this, I want to argue, is the most powerful and transformative possibility of service-learning in higher education.

叙述

使尴尬

the academy. Drawing on key theoretical insights and empirical studies, Butin details the limits and possibilities of the future of community engagement in developing and sustaining the engaged campus.978-0-230-62251-7978-0-230-10615-4

仇恨

The Limits of Service-Learningstitutional limits to service-learning across the academy. These limits, moreover, are inherent to the service-learning movement as contemporarily theorized and enacted. As such, there may be a fundamental and unbridgeable gap between the rhetoric and reality of the aspirations of the present-day service-learning movement.

吸引人的花招

The Futures of Service-Learning?nity as central components of their programs. These models, I suggest, offer multiple visions of how service-learning may be rethought in the academy. Yet I also conclude that all of these models are premised on and structured around a departmental and disciplinary notion of teaching, learning, and scholarship.