Titlebook: Safer Systems; Proceedings of the F Felix Redmill,Tom Anderson Conference proceedings 1997 Springer-Verlag London Limited 1997 Management.S

Spring

书目名称Safer Systems影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Safer Systems影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Safer Systems网络公开度




书目名称Safer Systems网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Safer Systems被引频次




书目名称Safer Systems被引频次学科排名




书目名称Safer Systems年度引用




书目名称Safer Systems年度引用学科排名




书目名称Safer Systems读者反馈




书目名称Safer Systems读者反馈学科排名

Promotion

Designing for Safety: Current Activities at the University of Bristol and Future Directions,r the existing multi-disciplinary strengths from different departments. The Centre has founding sponsorship from the Civil Aviation Authority, Lloyd’s Register, Nuclear/Magnox Electric and Railtrack. This funding has been used to develop an underlying research programme on fundamental safety design

美丽的写

Formal Methods: No Cure for Faulty Reasoning,ign of safety-critical systems. But, despite the mathematical nature of the logic systems underlying most formal notations, many aspects of formal methods are much less predictable than one might realise. Specifically, it is suggested that the ways in which people interpret and reason about formal d

Ligneous

Ccu106

How to Improve Safety Critical Systems Standards,ould be clear what is required in order to conform to the standard, while for assessors it should be possible to determine objectively compliance to the standard. The existing set of standards do not pass this basic quality test. We provide a framework for improving such standards. We view a standar

Slit-Lamp

Engineering Cognitive Diversity,ches to achieving diversity are identified. The first requires diversity to be created within the task environment. The second relies on individual differences in task performance that can be used to engineer diversity Empirical evidence is presented to support the potential of both methods, and imp

crease

个阿姨勾引你

The StAR Risk Adviser: Psychological Arguments for Qualitative Risk Assessment,aracterised by a lack of appropriate historical data which creates difficulties for conventional quantitative approaches to risk assessment. Numerical risk assessments which convey spurious validity and precision can be dangerously misleading. Here we describe and explain the psychological rationale

CRUDE

善变

Initial Safety Considerations for an Advanced Transport System,istic but ambitious target accident rates for PRT are set through a comparative examination of other transport modes. The rate set meets or exceeds accident rates achieved on other forms of surface transport, and is better than those of the car by a factor of more than ten. Evidence from existing sy