Titlebook: Romanticism and Blackwood‘s Magazine; ‘An Unprecedented Ph Robert Morrison,Daniel S. Roberts (Reader) Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a divis

avulsion

LITHE

神圣在玷污

一再困扰

屈尊

, ‘Personalities’ter quoted in ., has sometimes been taken as a generalized description of Romanticism itself, Coleridge was in fact responding to a specific debate about the place of ‘personalities’ in public discourse, and especially in periodical writing. In this essay, I will sketch the contours of that debate a

使人烦燥

Communal Reception, Mary Shelley, and the ‘, School’ of Criticismtte of characteristically Blackwoodian tics, tropes, and dogmas to draw upon. Even though at the time the magazine was but a few years old, it had developed so wide an audience and so distinctive a voice that Deacon could fully expect his readers to grasp and delight in the pitch-perfect tenor of hi

Outwit

Blackwoodian Allusion and the Culture of Miscellaneity first number set out intending to ‘examine the morality, the consistency, the composition of that Magazine, in regular order’. Regularity proved impossible, however: ‘the whole of these are frequently so mixed, so crowded in the same paragraph, that it is more than difficult to analyze and arrange

执

圆柱

丰富

Prosing Poetry: , and Generic Transposition, 1820–1840 even as it published articles and arguments that worked to fight off the monster of undifferentiated discourse. From the early . attacks on the Cockney poets launched by John Gibson Lockhart, William Maginn, and John Wilson, to the parodies and stimulating narratives about lyric poets exchanged by