找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy; Douglas Hedley,David Leech Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Seventeenth

[复制链接]
楼主: 珍珠无
发表于 2025-3-23 12:48:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 16:28:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 20:58:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 22:13:23 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 04:30:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 09:15:31 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 10:44:54 | 显示全部楼层
,‘This Is Not Quite Fair, Master More!’: Coleridge and the Cambridge Platonists,ork for a thorough comparison of ideas. Both the Cambridge Platonists and Coleridge modified a strongly dualistic philosophical legacy, the former responding to Descartes, the latter to Kant. Indeed, Coleridge’s study of More, Cudworth and Smith took place in parallel with his engagement with German
发表于 2025-3-24 15:50:55 | 显示全部楼层
,‘A Track Pursuing Not Untrod Before’: Wordsworth, Plato and the Cambridge Platonists,commonplace associates his poetic decline with his gradual return to Christian orthodoxy. Even if true, his orthodoxy has many missing elements, and Wordsworth implicitly authorized a search for some philosophical or theological coherence in his work when he declared that an attentive reader of . wo
发表于 2025-3-24 21:28:29 | 显示全部楼层
,The Legacy of a ‘Living Library’: On the Reception of John Smith,l those who followed after him well into the twentieth century and beyond. Well established lines of influence both to and from Whichcote, Cudworth, and More are explored first before moving on to less well-known connections to Bishop Simon Patrick and mathematician Isaac Barrow. Smith’s continued s
发表于 2025-3-25 02:57:10 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-14 14:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表