找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Revisioning Cambridge Platonism: Sources and Legacy; Douglas Hedley,David Leech Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Seventeenth

[复制链接]
楼主: 珍珠无
发表于 2025-3-26 22:22:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 01:18:54 | 显示全部楼层
,‘A Philosopher at Randome’: Translating Jacob Böhme in Seventeenth-Century Cambridge,ing Böhme in England. Second, I discuss the strategies of readers and translators of Böhme active in seventeenth-century Cambridge. Third, I compare the approaches of two main readers, Henry More and Charles Hotham, demonstrating that they were aware of the gap that had opened between the ‘German Bö
发表于 2025-3-27 07:04:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 10:50:57 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 15:14:30 | 显示全部楼层
,‘Have Ye Not Heard That We Cannot Serve Two Masters?’: The Platonism of Mary Wollstonecraft,e her eclectic in her use of ideas and argument. She seems however to have been inspired by conceptions of the soul, love, truth and virtue that have their origins in Platonism. Considering her in this light provides greater insights into her philosophy of mind as well as her social and political vi
发表于 2025-3-27 19:49:13 | 显示全部楼层
,‘This Is Not Quite Fair, Master More!’: Coleridge and the Cambridge Platonists,oncludes with a brief consideration of the theme of the pre-existence of the soul. Despite the apparently radical nature of Coleridge’s transition from Unitarianism to Trinitarianism, it emerges that his maintenance of interest in the historical scholarship of Cudworth and the poetry and philosophy
发表于 2025-3-27 23:42:41 | 显示全部楼层
,‘A Track Pursuing Not Untrod Before’: Wordsworth, Plato and the Cambridge Platonists,nation of . in the light of Cambridge Platonist thought follows, and reveals a surprising degree of affinity across a range of ideas: the primacy of Reason, the unity of the laws of mind and nature, the idea of a plastic nature, as well as Reason delivering moral absolutes, the senses rejected as a
发表于 2025-3-28 05:48:43 | 显示全部楼层
,The Legacy of a ‘Living Library’: On the Reception of John Smith,s Jones, Pierre Hadot, and others. This chapter, offers a broad, but highly selective, overview of the reception and influence of Smith’s life and work. It is intended, however, as a call for future research more than as an authoritative presentation of Smith’s legacy. For, if the Cambridge Platonis
发表于 2025-3-28 08:29:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 14:14:09 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2019f expertise from across the following disciplines: philosophy, Neoplatonic studies, religious studies, intellectual history, seventeenth-century literature, women’s writing, and dissenting studies.The essays were originally presented at a series of workshops in Cambridge on the Cambridge Platonists funded by the AHRC..
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-14 14:19
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表