Titlebook: Numerical Treatment of the Navier-Stokes Equations; Proceedings of the F Wolfgang Hackbusch,Rolf Rannacher Conference proceedings 1990 Spri

Hdl348

Alienated

Dri727

,Laminar Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction — A Numerical Test Problem,aper identifies various length scales of the interaction region which impose cosiderable restrictions on the numerical grid. It is shown that the wall pressure distribution is not useful for assessing the numerical accuracy. The pressure at the edge of the boundary layer is proposed as an expedient

沙草纸

ODIUM

Afflict

,NSFLEX — An Implicit Relaxation Method for the Navier-Stokes Equations for a Wide Range of Mach Numlows is discribed. Applications are given for simple two-dimensional as well as for complex three-dimensional configurations. Real gas effects are incorporated in the solution procedure. For turbulent flows the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations are employed using an algebraic turbulence mode

Analogy

评论者

Analysis and Application of A Line Solver for the Recirculating Flows Using Multigrid Methods,ne Solver), is based on the SCGS scheme. The technique is applied to the driven cavity problem for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. A Fourier analysis of this technique is carried out. The scheme is simple and easy to programme. The rates of convergence and the computational times are rep

噱头

A Posteriori Error Estimators and Adaptive Mesh-Refinement for a Mixed Finite Element Discretizatiobased on evaluating on each triangle the residual of the computed solution with respect to the strong form of the differential equation. Numerical examples for the Taylor-Hood element show the efficiency of adaptive mesh-refinement based on this a posteriori error estimator.

秘密会议

R-Transforming Smoothers for the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations,ions. So we compare the influence of different artificial boundary conditions on the numerical performance of the TI-LU method from [8]. Further, we apply ILU from [9] in the r-transforming framework and obtain a reasonable improvement of the SIMPLE method by that. Finally we compare the efficiency