找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Natural Selection; Revisiting its Expla Richard G. Delisle Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Natural selection.genetic changes.

[复制链接]
楼主: relapse
发表于 2025-3-28 15:46:49 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 20:56:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 23:00:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 05:53:24 | 显示全部楼层
Little Evolution, BIG Evolution: Rethinking the History of Darwinism, Population Genetics, and the “ “evolutionary synthesis.” By noting how Darwin, Galton, DeVries, Fisher, Wright, Haldane, Chetverikov, Severtsov, Filipchenko, Dobzhansky, Goldschmidt, J. Huxley, Mayr, Simpson, Guyénot, Rensch, and others understood the distinction, and the language and arguments they used, the article chronicles
发表于 2025-3-29 09:13:06 | 显示全部楼层
When Panpsychism Met Monism: Why Did the Philosopher Theodor Ziehen Become a Crucial Figure for the re philosopher who developed a very sophisticated and radical form of panpsychism. While Ziehen’s work left few traces within the history of philosophy itself, his epistemology enjoyed significant influence within German evolutionary biology. Most prominently, Ziehen had a great impact on the “co-ar
发表于 2025-3-29 11:38:48 | 显示全部楼层
Inertia, Trend, and Momentum Reconsidered: G. G. Simpson—An Orthogeneticist? of orthogenesis in his discipline. Following the neo-Darwinian agenda, he thought that this theory had little basis to be proven. Since then, orthogenesis has been defined in textbooks as a “metaphysical,” “vitalistic,” or “theological” theory. However, in the present analysis, I demonstrate that S
发表于 2025-3-29 19:34:14 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-29 20:36:18 | 显示全部楼层
What’s Natural About Natural Selection?their immediate circumstances—it was also the agent provocateur of the pool of variation from which it chose these better-adapted features. Gradually, over immense amounts of time, the accumulation of these “infinitesimally small” adaptive changes would yield a new species. After Morgan successfully
发表于 2025-3-30 03:30:44 | 显示全部楼层
Natural Selection, Morphoprocess and a Logical Field of Evolutionary Conceptssm. This tradition culminated in the paradigm of the Modern Synthesis. This study invites the reader to critically examine the precept that selectogenesis is the only possible framework for an evolutionary synthesis. Abundant data on the organisation of living systems at all levels, from molecules t
发表于 2025-3-30 04:59:03 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-3 12:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表