Titlebook: Mapping the Higher Education Landscape; Towards a European C Frans Vught Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Bologna.Bologn

labyrinth

The European Higher Education Classification: Objectives and Concepts,ection 4.5, we point out the design principles underlying our classification of higher education institutions. In Section 4.6, we introduce the main concepts and components of a first version of such a classification and discuss its data needs. In the final section we address the relevant use of the

倾听

FADE

Serenity

拱墙

软弱

1571-0378 rnative.Opens up a new debate about international quality of.An important contribution to the international discussion on higher education globalization and worldwide rankings of higher education institutions, this volume criticizes the existing one-dimensional and aggregated international ranking m

minimal

Using the Classification in the European Higher Education Area,gher education classification can make to this area will be explored. What exactly can the classification contribute to the EHEA, to its diversification or convergence, and in which respects will it help to increase transparency of higher education in Europe?

Odyssey

Rankings and Classifications: The Need for a Multidimensional Approach, more transparency (see Chapter 3). A particular approach to ranking, developed by CHE,. will be presented as a best-practice alternative to many of the shortcomings of conventional rankings. On the basis of cross-border pilot studies its potential for developing into a wider European system will be explored.

胶状

Using the Classification for Institutional Profiling: The University of Strathclyde,both external reputation and institutional self-image that they can no longer be ignored. Yet they can easily pull an institution away from its unique mission, often aligned with the particular needs of the local community, towards the orthodoxy that secures league table success. Thus league tables are the enemy of diversity.

含沙射影