找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Logic in Law; Remarks on Logic and Arend Soeteman Book 1989 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1989 Legal Logic.deontic logic.formal

[复制链接]
楼主: 战神
发表于 2025-3-23 11:50:33 | 显示全部楼层
A Standard System of Deontic Logic,have not stated that they cannot be accepted as a rational reconstruction of normative reasoning. There is, nevertheless, a formal system on which, although it has been disputed as a whole as well as with regard to its theorems, several other systems are founded, which other systems can be regarded
发表于 2025-3-23 16:54:58 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 20:07:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 01:04:28 | 显示全部楼层
Conditional Norms,). In section VI.8 we have seen that the internal deontic implication cannot provide an adequate formulation of ‘commitment’. Also with regard to the external deontic implication, discussed in section VI.9, there were difficulties.
发表于 2025-3-24 04:51:03 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 09:29:50 | 显示全部楼层
Law and Philosophy Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/l/image/588025.jpg
发表于 2025-3-24 13:39:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 15:41:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 21:55:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 00:13:04 | 显示全部楼层
The Possibility of Deontic Logic,is ‘no longer self-evident that logic presents a possibility for normative reasoning’. This is connected with the fact that, if normative judgements cannot be derived from factual judgements, it is no longer self-evident that those normative judgements can be either true of false.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-27 00:17
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表