| 书目名称 | Logic in Law | | 副标题 | Remarks on Logic and | | 编辑 | Arend Soeteman | | 视频video | | | 丛书名称 | Law and Philosophy Library | | 图书封面 |  | | 描述 | The study presented in this book was entered upon by me from a legal point of view. ‘Legal logic‘ has been known for a long time, concerning itself with the methodology of legal and in particular judicial reasoning. In modern days, however, this ‘legal logic‘ is sometimes also connected with modern formal logic, as it has been developed in the works of G. Boole, A. de Morgan, G. Frege, C.S. Peirce, E. Schroder, G. Peano, A.N. Whitehead, B. Russell and others. For me this gave rise to the as yet not very specific question about the meaning of modern symbolic logic for law. Already in an early stage it appeared that, although traditional legal logic and modern symbolic logic both concern logic, this may not create the misapprehension that a similar matter is at issue. Both concern themselves (among other things) with reasonings and reasoning. Traditional legal logic is, however, as it was said by the German legal theoretician K. Engisch: "a material logic that wants us to reflect on what we have to do if we -within the limits of actual possibility- wish to reach true, or at least correct judgements" (Engisch, 1964, p.5). Modern symbolic logic on the other hand is not concerned with t | | 出版日期 | Book 1989 | | 关键词 | Legal Logic; deontic logic; formal logic; logic; symbolic logic | | 版次 | 1 | | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7821-9 | | isbn_softcover | 978-90-481-4035-0 | | isbn_ebook | 978-94-015-7821-9Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315 | | issn_series | 1572-4395 | | copyright | Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1989 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
发表于 2025-3-21 20:04:40
