找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Logic and Argumentation; Third International Mehdi Dastani,Huimin Dong,Leon van der Torre Conference proceedings 2020 Springer Nature Swit

[复制链接]
查看: 20140|回复: 58
发表于 2025-3-21 16:37:32 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Logic and Argumentation
副标题Third International
编辑Mehdi Dastani,Huimin Dong,Leon van der Torre
视频video
丛书名称Lecture Notes in Computer Science
图书封面Titlebook: Logic and Argumentation; Third International  Mehdi Dastani,Huimin Dong,Leon van der Torre Conference proceedings 2020 Springer Nature Swit
描述.This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the Third International Conference on Logic and Argumentation, CLAR 2020, held in Hangzhou, China, in April 2020. The 14 full and 7 short papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 31 submissions. The papers cover the focus of the CLAR series, including formal models of argumentation, logics for decision making and uncertainreasoning, formal models of evidence, con rmation, and justi cation, logics forgroup cognition and social network, reasoning about norms, formal representationsof natural language and legal texts, as well as applications of argumentationon climate engineering..
出版日期Conference proceedings 2020
关键词argumentation; artificial intelligence; autonomous agents; computer programming; computer science; comput
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44638-3
isbn_softcover978-3-030-44637-6
isbn_ebook978-3-030-44638-3Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349
issn_series 0302-9743
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Logic and Argumentation影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Logic and Argumentation影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Logic and Argumentation网络公开度




书目名称Logic and Argumentation网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Logic and Argumentation被引频次




书目名称Logic and Argumentation被引频次学科排名




书目名称Logic and Argumentation年度引用




书目名称Logic and Argumentation年度引用学科排名




书目名称Logic and Argumentation读者反馈




书目名称Logic and Argumentation读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:15:01 | 显示全部楼层
Group Beliefit does not satisfy the D axiom). In the literature there is no detailed completeness proof for axiomatizations of KD45 with distributed belief that we are aware of, and there has been some confusion regarding soundness of such axiomatizations related to the mentioned lack of preservation. In this p
发表于 2025-3-22 04:11:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:24:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 08:57:00 | 显示全部楼层
Broadening Label-Based Argumentation Semantics with May-Must Scalesfferent ways. Among them, the labelling-based approach allows for a concise and flexible determination of acceptability statuses of arguments through assignment of a label indicating acceptance, rejection, or undecided to each argument. In this work, we contemplate a way of broadening it by accommod
发表于 2025-3-22 16:15:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 18:19:45 | 显示全部楼层
Logic Programming, Argumentation and Human Reasoningtion of abstract argumentation in the 1990s, connections between argumentation semantics and logic programming semantics have been studied, but existing work on this connection has not yet covered the weak completion semantics. In this paper we define a novel translation from logic programs to abstr
发表于 2025-3-22 23:12:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:14:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 05:36:09 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-26 06:06
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表