Titlebook: Logic and Argumentation; 4th International Co Pietro Baroni,Christoph Benzmüller,Yὶ N. Wáng Conference proceedings 2021 Springer Nature Swi

Counteract

0302-9743 notonic reasoning, dispute and dialogue systems, formal treatment of preference and support, and well as applications in areas like vaccine information and processing of legal texts.978-3-030-89390-3978-3-030-89391-0Series ISSN 0302-9743 Series E-ISSN 1611-3349

Munificent

Resolving the Cohenian Paradox in Judicial Probability Theoryusibility theory by substantially improving it with the help of Bayesian decision theory. In this paper, by contrast, we attempt to defend the probabilistic approach - legal probabilism and Bayesian decision theory on the basis of relative plausibility theory.

Relinquish

Burdens of Persuasion and Standards of Proof in Structured Argumentationh persuasion entails establishing the complementary proposition..Finally, we examine how burdens of proofs can be integrated with standards of proof defining the extent to which an argument for a proposition burdened with persuasion has to be stronger than arguments to the contrary, in order to meet the burden.

渐强

闲逛

边缘带来墨水

Deadpan

A Logic for Binary Classifiers and Their ExplanationFinally, we present two extensions of our language: a dynamic extension by the notion of assignment enabling classifier change and an epistemic extension in which the classifier’s uncertainty about the actual input can be represented.

明确

头盔

桶去微染

Burdens of Persuasion and Standards of Proof in Structured Argumentationngs are discussed in general, distinguishing the burdens of production and the burdens of persuasion. Then, we focus on burdens of persuasion, illustrating their role in civil and criminal law..A formal model for the burden of persuasion is then defined, discussed, and used to capture the role of th