找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Logic and Argumentation; 4th International Co Pietro Baroni,Christoph Benzmüller,Yὶ N. Wáng Conference proceedings 2021 Springer Nature Swi

[复制链接]
楼主: 母牛胆小鬼
发表于 2025-3-25 06:52:20 | 显示全部楼层
Implementation of Choice of Jurisdiction and Law in Private International Law by PROLEG Meta-interprn of private international law, . (the choice of country whose court can have a competence to treat the affairs) and . (the choice of law on which the judgement of the affair is based) are main questions. In this paper, we give an implementation of both questions using extending PROLEG meta-interpre
发表于 2025-3-25 09:32:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 13:28:25 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 18:42:29 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 23:04:34 | 显示全部楼层
On Restricting the Impact of Self-attacking Arguments in Gradual Semanticsts for extension-based semantics because those arguments are always rejected (as soon as the semantics in question respect conflict-freeness). In case of gradual semantics, the question is more complex, since other criteria are taken into account. A way to check the impact of these arguments is to u
发表于 2025-3-26 02:11:50 | 显示全部楼层
Flexible Dispute Derivations with Forward and Backward Arguments for Assumption-Based Argumentationing claims in a dialectical manner: i.e. on the basis of an exchange of arguments and counter-arguments for a claim between a proponent and an opponent of the claim. Current versions of dispute derivations are geared towards determining (credulous) acceptance of claims w.r.t. the admissibility-based
发表于 2025-3-26 05:45:55 | 显示全部楼层
Towards a General Theory of Decomposability in Abstract Argumentationcome based on local evaluations in subframeworks. As such, the paper extends a previous work by generalizing over the kind of information locally exploited. While not concerned with specific semantics, the paper shows the range of decomposable semantics with varying degrees of local information. It
发表于 2025-3-26 11:47:24 | 显示全部楼层
Abstract Argumentation with Qualitative Uncertainty: An Analysis in Dynamic Logicnt formalisms for arguing with qualitative forms of uncertainty. More in particular, we encode the main reasoning tasks of (rich) incomplete argumentation frameworks and control argumentation frameworks. After that, and inspired by our encoding, we define and study a new class of structures that are
发表于 2025-3-26 12:39:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 19:57:43 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-1 20:30
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表