Titlebook: Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought; Ian Ward Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997 Foucault.Hannah Ar

endoscopy

独行者

Introduction,ithout making any claim that the genealogy requires a consistent historical context. Ultimately, it will be suggested that the genealogy reveals a far greater degree of common ground in contemporary legal thought than is often surmised. Rather than perceiving Kantianism and critical legal thought to

相符

The Crisis of Judgment,er’s works, and later expressed himself to be particularly impressed by Heidegger’s working of the concepts of freedom and responsibility. It is commonly suggested that Sartre began to compose . as an immediate response to Heidegger, and as a personal expression of self-assertion (McBride 1991, pp.2

dainty

1572-4395 ndthat by concentrating on the commonality of this tradition,contemporary legal theory can better appreciate the reconstructivepotential of the critical legal project.978-90-481-4911-7978-94-015-8830-0Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315

agonist

neutrophils

ALT

Outspoken

minimal

Book 1997, andUnger and Dworkin. Ultimately, it will be suggested that each of thesephilosophers is writing within a common intellectual tradition, andthat by concentrating on the commonality of this tradition,contemporary legal theory can better appreciate the reconstructivepotential of the critical legal project.

BRIEF

Introduction,ere are few confessed Kantian legal theorists, and relatively little overt Kantian legal writing. It is, however, the purpose of this book to suggest that there is a considerable amount of covert Kantianism abroad in contemporary legal thought. Indeed, it will be suggested that, aside from the alrea