设为首页收藏本站
开启辅助访问 切换到窄版

 找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步，快速开始

扫一扫，访问微社区

  • ALL
  • Journals
  • Books

派博传思国际中心 »期刊书目

› BOOKS
› BOOKS with Alphabet K (Ka, Kb,Kc, Kd, Ke…... )

12345下一页
返回列表

Titlebook: Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought; Ian Ward Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997 Foucault.Hannah Ar

[复制链接]
查看: 41326|回复: 40
发表于 2025-3-21 17:32:30 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought
编辑Ian Ward
视频video
丛书名称Law and Philosophy Library
图书封面Titlebook: Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought; Ian Ward Book 1997 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997 Foucault.Hannah Ar
描述.Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought.presents a challenging alternative theory of legal philosophy. Thecentral thesis of the book suggests an accommodation between three ofthe most influential contemporary theories of law, Kantianism,postmodernism and critical legal thought. In doing so, it furthersuggests that the often perceived distance between these theories oflaw disguises a common intellectual foundation. This foundation liesin the work of Immanuel Kant. ..Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought. presents anintellectual history of critical legal thinking, beginning with Kant,and then proceeding through philosphers and legal theorists as diverseas Heidegger and Arendt, Foucault and Derrida, Rorty and Rawls, andUnger and Dworkin. Ultimately, it will be suggested that each of thesephilosophers is writing within a common intellectual tradition, andthat by concentrating on the commonality of this tradition,contemporary legal theory can better appreciate the reconstructivepotential of the critical legal project.
出版日期Book 1997
关键词Foucault; Hannah Arendt; Immanuel Kant; John Rawls; Michel Foucault; legal thinking; morality; responsibili
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8830-0
isbn_softcover978-90-481-4911-7
isbn_ebook978-94-015-8830-0Series ISSN 1572-4395 Series E-ISSN 2215-0315
issn_series 1572-4395
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought网络公开度




书目名称Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought被引频次




书目名称Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought被引频次学科排名




书目名称Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought年度引用




书目名称Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought年度引用学科排名




书目名称Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought读者反馈




书目名称Kantianism, Postmodernism and Critical Legal Thought读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
1.jpg
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics
2.jpg
 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty
3.jpg
 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory
4.jpg
 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance
5.jpg
 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage
您所在的用户组没有投票权限
FROM
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 00:01:19 | 显示全部楼层
Book 1997gests an accommodation between three ofthe most influential contemporary theories of law, Kantianism,postmodernism and critical legal thought. In doing so, it furthersuggests that the often perceived distance between these theories oflaw disguises a common intellectual foundation. This foundation li
半圆凿
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 02:49:32 | 显示全部楼层
Immanuel Kant and the Foundations of Critique,active ‘lived’ theology, and Kant’s subsequent religious writings were to reveal a deep distrust of dogmatic theology. The impulse towards moral virtue came from within, and this was to become the central assertion of Kant’s theory of duty and obligation, around which he built his critique of practical reason.
infelicitous
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 08:14:49 | 显示全部楼层
Ascendancy
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 10:06:02 | 显示全部楼层
Postmodern Bourgeois Liberalism,er a number of other political philosophers including John Rawls and Roberto Unger. The purpose of this chapter is to investigate the nature of this particular genealogy and to assess the validity of Rorty’s dominion.
摇曳
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 15:46:05 | 显示全部楼层
Critical Legal Studies and Beyond,m provides the fuel for liberalism, and as we saw in the previous chapter, the ability of a consensus theory to ameliorate the pluralist critique is an explicit recognition that the Rawlsian thesis complements the Ungerian (Altman 1990).
engrave
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 20:58:50 | 显示全部楼层
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-22 21:53:38 | 显示全部楼层
978-90-481-4911-7Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1997
lipoatrophy
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-23 01:32:05 | 显示全部楼层
miscreant
回复

举报

发表于 2025-3-23 06:38:42 | 显示全部楼层
reception
回复

举报

下一页 »
12345下一页
返回列表
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-15 18:55
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表