找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Kurt Gödel; Unpublished Philosop Francisco A. Rodríguez-Consuegra Book 1995 Springer Basel AG 1995 Volume.boundary element method.construct

[复制链接]
楼主: Systole
发表于 2025-3-23 13:12:45 | 显示全部楼层
The analytic-synthetic distinctionecalled that the Gödel manuscripts appearing here were a direct philosophical reaction to Carnap’s viewpoint, and there is no other sufficiently detailed presentation of this viewpoint in the literature. I am convinced that Gödel’s manuscripts cannot be properly understood without having at least a summary of Carnap’s construction available.
发表于 2025-3-23 15:57:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 21:57:58 | 显示全部楼层
Is mathematics syntax of language?, IIyntax of language.. I.e. the validity of mathematical propositions consists solely in their being consequences. of certain syntactical conventions about the use of symbols,. not in their describing states of affairs in some realm of things. Or, as Carnap puts it: ...
发表于 2025-3-24 00:40:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 02:58:54 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 08:59:12 | 显示全部楼层
http://image.papertrans.cn/k/image/541300.jpg
发表于 2025-3-24 10:43:31 | 显示全部楼层
Is mathematics syntax of language?, VIIt is well known that Carnap has carried through, in great detail the conception that mathematics is syntax of language. However, not enough attention has been paid to the fact that the philosophical assertions which form the original content and the chief interest of this conception have by no means been proved thereby.
发表于 2025-3-24 15:57:24 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-9248-3Volume; boundary element method; construction; language; logic; mathematics; philosophical works; philosoph
发表于 2025-3-24 21:49:17 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-24 23:48:05 | 显示全部楼层
Some basic theorems on the foundations of mathematics and their philosophical implicationsof reducing the concept of finite procedure to that of a machine with a finite number of parts, as has been done by the British mathematician Turing. As for the philosophical consequences of the results under consideration, I don’t think they have ever been adequately discussed or only taken notice
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-10 10:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表