Titlebook: Incommensurability and Related Matters; Paul Hoyningen-Huene,Howard Sankey Book 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001 educat

Agronomy

领先

Incommensurability and the Normative Foundations of Scientific Knowledge of rational debate in science; (3) It is refuted by the existence of neutral, external, universal standards of theory-assessment in science; (4) It is refuted by the fact that there are typically good scientific reasons for preferring some standards to others, which relativists cannot see because t

ectropion

幸福愉悦感

Reasons, Radical Change and Incommensurability in Sciencece. Some of the strengths of this view, as contrasted with some major alternative interpretations of science, are sketched. In particular, the view that some ideas, in some theories or traditions, are “incommensurable” with ideas in at least some other scientific theories or traditions is analyzed critically and reinterpreted.

思考才皱眉

Concept Formation and Commensurabilitysfers what is thought to be known about languages to science. Employing a cognitive-historical method that shifts the focus to the representational and reasoning practices of scientists in constructing new concepts provides a way of uncovering the nature of the . relations between successive representations of a domain.

Predigest

空洞

sulcus

set598

编辑才信任