Titlebook: Incommensurability and Related Matters; Paul Hoyningen-Huene,Howard Sankey Book 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2001 educat

obdurate

书目名称Incommensurability and Related Matters影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Incommensurability and Related Matters影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Incommensurability and Related Matters网络公开度




书目名称Incommensurability and Related Matters网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Incommensurability and Related Matters被引频次




书目名称Incommensurability and Related Matters被引频次学科排名




书目名称Incommensurability and Related Matters年度引用




书目名称Incommensurability and Related Matters年度引用学科排名




书目名称Incommensurability and Related Matters读者反馈




书目名称Incommensurability and Related Matters读者反馈学科排名

Delude

Changing Laws and Shifting Concepts a rational reconstruction of the notion underlying the writings of Feyerabend and the later Kuhn. I claim that such a coherent notion can be identified and that relevant instances exist. Incommensurability is brought about by theoretical incompatibility. The translation failure between incommensura

诱骗

公社

Gossamer

卜闻

Incommensurability and the Normative Foundations of Scientific Knowledgendards of theory assessment. My aim is to justify a position of moderate relativism. This position seeks to accommodate the essential role of evidence, reasons, and reasoning in scientific choice/belief; while also giving sociological and historical factors an essential role in explaining and justif

Disk199

Reasons, Radical Change and Incommensurability in Sciencesons. In addition to changes in meanings and substantive claims, such change also often involves alterations in standards, goals, and methods of science. Some of the strengths of this view, as contrasted with some major alternative interpretations of science, are sketched. In particular, the view th

BIDE

Incommensurability, Rationality and Relativism: In Science, Culture and Science Educationlistic conclusions can be legitimately drawn from the .-arguments concerning incommensurability. I then consider incommensurability understood more broadly than it is usually understood in philosophy of science, as involving not two or more incomparable scientific theories, but rather fundamentally

Afflict

Incommensurability and “Multicultural Science”derived from different cultures underlie the salience of questions (e.g., about seeds) that arise when phenomena are considered explicitly as objects of human experience and social value, and that are open to empirical address but side-lined in mainstream modern scientific inquiry. Attention to such

Cabinet

Incommensurability and Conceptual Change during the Copernican Revolutionity of Copenhagen) and Xiang Chen (California Lutheran University) I have developed a more general account along the same lines using the dynamic frame notation introduced by cognitive psychologist Lawrence Barsalou (Emory University, Atlanta). Here I apply a simplified version of this model to the