Titlebook: Hamlet after Deconstruction; Aneta Mancewicz Book 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springe

工作

ve potential in terms of .. It looks at how this version accumulates, contrasts, and questions ideas related to the source to portray a paradigm shift in Shakespeare’s lifetime. The application of . in . reflects the artists’ fascination with .’s historical complexity, alongside their critical persp

古老

向下

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20174-5f its tragic source, such as the greatness of the tragic hero, the complexity of philosophical problems, and the intricacies of poetic language. Most importantly, it discards the eponymous hero himself. With this gesture, La Ruina questions the relevance of classical tragedy today. As Hamlet disappe

overture

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73875-4her, where the contestants try to win the audience attention. Given extraordinary similarities between the development of events in . and in ., the action of Shakespeare’s tragedy runs as a trace throughout this version, creating the effects of doubling and distortion. At the same time, Bauersima’s

Myofibrils

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-18041-7 theatre. The application of supplement, ., and trace as critical instruments foregrounds the acts of suspending and deferring the presence of an object and its ultimate meaning. A deconstructive analysis might thus suggest that . is becoming less present and visible in post-war drama and theatre, s

Cpap155

概观

Supplementd in three deconstructive versions of . in the following chapters: Tom Stoppard’s . (Chapter 3), Alice Birch and Katie Mitchell’s . (Chapter 4), and Janusz Głowacki’s . (Chapter 5). Chapter 2 explains how supplement undermines the possibility and purpose of action, and as such introduces a negative

人工制品

Tom Stopparders to the status of main protagonists only to show them vainly striving to make sense of fragmentary and metatheatrical scenes from .. At the heart of Stoppard’s supplement is the inclusion of contradictory elements. He applies deconstruction as a dialectical method in that he assembles contrasting

fodlder

calumniate