找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights; Reconciling Law and Stefan Schäferling Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

[复制链接]
楼主: satisficer
发表于 2025-3-26 21:20:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 04:51:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 07:09:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 11:32:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 13:52:11 | 显示全部楼层
Mechanical Twinning of Crystalser, the human decision-making process does not always correspond to the ideal image of fact based objective legal reasoning. This chapter introduces different theories on human decision-making and points out its strengths and flaws. It also shows how the functioning of human decision-making processe
发表于 2025-3-27 19:14:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 22:35:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 04:23:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 08:12:37 | 显示全部楼层
Susan R. Wilcox,Ani Aydin,Evie G. Marcolinial right against automated decisions to protect human personhood and agency can serve as a starting point for further regulation. It demonstrates the insufficiency of other regulatory tools before showing that in some legal systems, dignitary concerns provide a sound legal basis for such a proposed
发表于 2025-3-28 12:01:00 | 显示全部楼层
Clinical Examination and Assessment,uch a right’s content and role in a future legal framework. An undifferentiated approach that categorically excludes automation will not do justice to the multifaceted and complex issues involved, especially given the weaknesses of human decision-making. Instead, it is necessary to balance the confl
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-22 08:05
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表