找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights; Reconciling Law and Stefan Schäferling Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

[复制链接]
楼主: satisficer
发表于 2025-3-26 21:20:36 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 04:51:50 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 07:09:05 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 11:32:53 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 13:52:11 | 显示全部楼层
Mechanical Twinning of Crystalser, the human decision-making process does not always correspond to the ideal image of fact based objective legal reasoning. This chapter introduces different theories on human decision-making and points out its strengths and flaws. It also shows how the functioning of human decision-making processe
发表于 2025-3-27 19:14:09 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 22:35:47 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 04:23:27 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 08:12:37 | 显示全部楼层
Susan R. Wilcox,Ani Aydin,Evie G. Marcolinial right against automated decisions to protect human personhood and agency can serve as a starting point for further regulation. It demonstrates the insufficiency of other regulatory tools before showing that in some legal systems, dignitary concerns provide a sound legal basis for such a proposed
发表于 2025-3-28 12:01:00 | 显示全部楼层
Clinical Examination and Assessment,uch a right’s content and role in a future legal framework. An undifferentiated approach that categorically excludes automation will not do justice to the multifaceted and complex issues involved, especially given the weaknesses of human decision-making. Instead, it is necessary to balance the confl
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-21 21:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表