找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights; Reconciling Law and Stefan Schäferling Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an

[复制链接]
查看: 36998|回复: 45
发表于 2025-3-21 18:22:16 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights
副标题Reconciling Law and
编辑Stefan Schäferling
视频video
概述Demonstrates the need for a new human right protecting the core values of human agency and dignity.Identifies the core human rights challenges posed by governmental use of automated decision-making te
丛书名称Law, Governance and Technology Series
图书封面Titlebook: Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights; Reconciling Law and  Stefan Schäferling Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) an
描述With the growing capabilities of artificial intelligence, governments are integrating AI technologies into administrative and even judicial decision-making, aiding and in some cases even replacing human decision-makers. Predictive policing, automated benefits administration, and automated risk assessment in criminal sentencing are but a few prominent examples of a general trend. While the turn towards governmental automated decision-making promises to reduce the impact of human biases and produce efficiency gains, reducing the human element in governmental decision-making also entails significant risks. This book analyses these risks through a comparative constitutional law and human rights lens, examining US law, German law, and international human rights law. It also highlights the structural challenges that automation poses for legal systems built on the assumption of exclusively human decision-making. Special attention is paid to the question whether existing law can adequately address the lack of transparency in governmental automated decision-making, its discriminatory processes and outcomes, as well as its fundamental challenge to human agency. Building on that analysis, it
出版日期Book 2023
关键词right against automated decision-making; governmental automated decision-making; predictive policing; a
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48125-3
isbn_softcover978-3-031-48127-7
isbn_ebook978-3-031-48125-3Series ISSN 2352-1902 Series E-ISSN 2352-1910
issn_series 2352-1902
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights网络公开度




书目名称Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights被引频次




书目名称Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights被引频次学科排名




书目名称Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights年度引用




书目名称Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights年度引用学科排名




书目名称Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights读者反馈




书目名称Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 22:26:04 | 显示全部楼层
Susan R. Wilcox,Ani Aydin,Evie G. Marcolinial right against automated decisions to protect human personhood and agency can serve as a starting point for further regulation. It demonstrates the insufficiency of other regulatory tools before showing that in some legal systems, dignitary concerns provide a sound legal basis for such a proposed right.
发表于 2025-3-22 01:50:47 | 显示全部楼层
The Case for a Right Against Automated Decision-Makingal right against automated decisions to protect human personhood and agency can serve as a starting point for further regulation. It demonstrates the insufficiency of other regulatory tools before showing that in some legal systems, dignitary concerns provide a sound legal basis for such a proposed right.
发表于 2025-3-22 04:36:08 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5340-5This chapter concludes by summarising the findings and calls for not carelessly sacrificing hard-won human rights achievements for efficiency gains, despite all the advantages that technological developments bring with them, recalling that, ultimately, law is meant to serve the good of humankind.
发表于 2025-3-22 11:41:06 | 显示全部楼层
Conclusion and OutlookThis chapter concludes by summarising the findings and calls for not carelessly sacrificing hard-won human rights achievements for efficiency gains, despite all the advantages that technological developments bring with them, recalling that, ultimately, law is meant to serve the good of humankind.
发表于 2025-3-22 16:12:39 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:21:00 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 21:31:46 | 显示全部楼层
Governmental Automated Decision-Making and Human Rights978-3-031-48125-3Series ISSN 2352-1902 Series E-ISSN 2352-1910
发表于 2025-3-23 03:08:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 07:01:09 | 显示全部楼层
Artificial Intelligence and Automated Decision-Making: Terminological Clarificationsal clarity. This chapter traces the development of the technology and decribes the basic processes behind AI. It explains why AI is not a helpful term from a regulatory perspective and suggests placing the problematic act of decision-making at the center of the further analysis.
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-22 07:52
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表