找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: George Eliot for the Twenty-First Century; Literature, Philosop K. M. Newton Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018

[复制链接]
楼主: 恳求
发表于 2025-3-26 23:37:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 01:41:12 | 显示全部楼层
Konzeptualisierung des Modells,at such views are untenable. Critical scrutiny of . in particular strongly suggests there is no commitment to any moral system and that she anticipates Bernard Williams’s moral philosophy with its emphasis on ‘the ethical’ rather than on morality as a set of principles or a system. Also Jacques Derr
发表于 2025-3-27 07:35:26 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05672-8thin Victorian conventions. Henry James, however, misses the point when he claims that Eliot neglects the opportunity for a properly psychological approach by refusing to restrict her focus to one dominating consciousness. Though still able to explore individual psychology in depth, in her later nov
发表于 2025-3-27 11:50:04 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-27 14:00:07 | 显示全部楼层
Ausgangslage und Problemstellung, cosmopolitanism. It also implies that British imperial power is likely to be under threat since there are hints that Germany and America will be the major powers of the future. It breaks new ground in the structure of its narrative, its treatment of psychology and temporality being complex and inno
发表于 2025-3-27 20:29:45 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-28 01:21:11 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91926-3George Eliot bicentennial; reception studies; otherness in literature; the other in literature; literary
发表于 2025-3-28 02:23:02 | 显示全部楼层
978-3-030-06330-6The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
发表于 2025-3-28 06:50:15 | 显示全部楼层
K. M. NewtonProvides a comprehensive overview of Eliot’s critical reception.Aims to bolster Eliot’s place as a canonical author.Explores the complexities of Eliot’s writing, mindset, and life through archival mat
发表于 2025-3-28 10:29:53 | 显示全部楼层
Wolfgang Harth,Helmut Grotheine Befragung in Deutschland eingestehen (Donsbach et al. 2009, S. 133). Die seither zwischen „Lügenpresse“-Vorwürfen und Vorstellungen einer „Vierten Gewalt“ oszillierende und eskalierende Diskussion dürfte das Bild des Journalismus in der Öffentlichkeit nicht versachlicht haben. Den Boden für solc
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-22 02:29
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表