Titlebook: George Eliot for the Twenty-First Century; Literature, Philosop K. M. Newton Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018

无意

Konzeptualisierung des Modells,ida’s exploration of the relation between ethics and undecidability is useful in providing insight into the ethical aspect of Eliot’s fiction. The critical emphasis in the chapter is on detailed readings of certain scenes, especially involving choices and dilemmas.

FLIC

浮雕

Introduction: A Brief Reflection on George Eliot Past, Present and Future,lism. There is also a discussion of new critical angles on her writings that are emerging or may emerge in the twenty-first century, together with an outline of the argument and structure of this book.

Fsh238

废除

Eliot and the Reinterpretation of the Ethical,ida’s exploration of the relation between ethics and undecidability is useful in providing insight into the ethical aspect of Eliot’s fiction. The critical emphasis in the chapter is on detailed readings of certain scenes, especially involving choices and dilemmas.

愚蠢人

小官

Book 2018 change perceptions of Eliot. Tracing Eliot’s literary reception from the nineteenth century to the late twentieth and early twenty-first century, K. M. Newton frames Eliot as an unorthodox radical and considers the philosophical, ethical, political, and artistic subtleties permeating her writings.

暴行

political, and artistic subtleties permeating her writings. Drawing from close readings of her novels, essays, and letters, Newton offers a new critical perspective on George Eliot and reveals her enduring relevance in the twenty-first century. .978-3-030-06330-6978-3-319-91926-3

Vertical

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28561-6arly twentieth centuries, to the recovery of her reputation as a major novelist from the 1940s, the various critical modes that have emerged since then, together with the later twentieth century critical objections by critics influenced by structuralism, post-structuralism, feminism and post-colonia

MAIM

Matthias Theiner,Christine Vallasterer conservative or liberal, or much modern thinking, in relation to the choices she made in her personal life, her politics and issues like the Jewish question. It is argued that her ‘revolutionary’ phase in the 1840s when she enthusiastically supported the 1848 revolutions was not, as is generally