找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Evaluating Critical Care; Using Health Service William J. Sibbald (Professor of Medicine, Physici Book 2002 Springer Science+Business Media

[复制链接]
查看: 32320|回复: 59
发表于 2025-3-21 19:44:07 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Evaluating Critical Care
副标题Using Health Service
编辑William J. Sibbald (Professor of Medicine, Physici
视频video
概述Includes supplementary material:
丛书名称Update in Intensive Care Medicine
图书封面Titlebook: Evaluating Critical Care; Using Health Service William J. Sibbald (Professor of Medicine, Physici Book 2002 Springer Science+Business Media
描述Measuring the quality of a complex service like critical care that combines the highest technology with the most intimate caring is a challenge. Recently, con­ sumers, clinicians, and payers have requested more formal assessments and comparisons of the quality and costs of medical care [2). Donabedian [1) pro­ posed a framework for thinking about the quality of medical care that separates quality into three components: structure, process, and outcome. An instructive analogy for understanding this framework is to imagine a food critic evaluating the quality of a restaurant. The critic might comment on the decoration and lighting ofthe restaurant, how close the tables are to each other, the extent ofthe wine list and where the chef trained. These are all evaluations of the restaurant structure. In addition, the critic might comment on whether the service was courteous and timely - measures of process. Finally, the critic might comment on outcomes like customer satisfaction or food poisoning. Similarly, to a health care critic, structure is the physical and human resources used to deliver medi­ cal care. Processes are the actual treatments offered to patients. Finally,outcomes are wha
出版日期Book 2002
关键词care; critical care; development; education; evaluation; health services; health services research; hospita
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56719-3
isbn_softcover978-3-540-42606-6
isbn_ebook978-3-642-56719-3Series ISSN 1610-4056
issn_series 1610-4056
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media New York 2002
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Evaluating Critical Care影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Evaluating Critical Care影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Evaluating Critical Care网络公开度




书目名称Evaluating Critical Care网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Evaluating Critical Care被引频次




书目名称Evaluating Critical Care被引频次学科排名




书目名称Evaluating Critical Care年度引用




书目名称Evaluating Critical Care年度引用学科排名




书目名称Evaluating Critical Care读者反馈




书目名称Evaluating Critical Care读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 0 人参与投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 20:45:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 02:57:52 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 05:26:44 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 12:02:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 16:55:22 | 显示全部楼层
Measuring Treatment Outcomes in Intensive Care: Mortality, Morbidity, and Organ Dysfunctionment and behavior are inextricably linked. I change my socks because I have worn them for a day, and carry an umbrella when it threatens to rain. The government changes when a rival party gains more votes than the party in power, and the melange of attitudes that create a culture change through the
发表于 2025-3-22 19:28:22 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 23:54:22 | 显示全部楼层
Quality of Life and Longer Term Outcomesre can be measured from at least three different perspectives: that of the patient and their relatives, that of the staff on the intensive care unit (ICU) and finally the perspective of health managers, economists and politicians. As none of these perspectives is similar, different measurement tools
发表于 2025-3-23 03:19:18 | 显示全部楼层
Comparing ICU Populations: Background and Current Methodsmined include mortality, complication rates, hospital and ICU length of stay, staffing level, or the use of treatment resources. A simple comparison of these outcomes, however, is frequently unsatisfactory because the characteristics of patients treated in different ICUs are not the same. In additio
发表于 2025-3-23 05:57:06 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-5-16 12:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表