Titlebook: European E-Democracy in Practice; Leonhard Hennen,Ira van Keulen,Rasmus Øjvind Niels Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and T

高尔夫

神化怪物

Antimicrobial

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-20240-0onditions needed to realise the democratic potential of the broad scope of tools, instruments and procedures to strengthen the ties between established processes of representative democratic decision-making and its constituencies, with a particular view to political communication and decision-making

牛的细微差别

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91118-7tical insights on the interplay between Internet-based communication and democratic processes. To this end, different normative views, aims and approaches of e-democracy are presented and systematically related to the central tenets of the main models of democracy. As e-participation plays an essent

genuine

Die ideale Minderheitsregierungblem and the debate about European citizenship and European identity—mainly in the light of insights from the EU crisis. This is followed by reflections on the recent discussion on the state of the mass media-based European public sphere. Finally, the author discusses the state of research on the In

切割

Hemiparesis

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13537-1. The authors indicate how the cases were selected based on different criteria such as diversity of institutional contexts and scales, geographical diversity and different types of citizen involvement. Each of the cases is described based on an evaluation framework for assessing the digital tools. T

aspersion

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-91722-6ordnetenwatch.de. Only the German tool is interactive; it also offers opportunities to ask questions to MPs, comment their voting behaviour and sign petitions. In their description and analysis of both cases, the authors put a strong focus on the participatory process and practical experiences of us

热烈的欢迎

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-92695-2: the Dutch website petities.nl and the Finnish Avoin Ministeriö (Open Ministry) which ceased to exist but was aimed to help citizens’ initiatives such as submitting a bill. Both are organised bottom-up. In their description and analysis of both cases, the authors put a strong focus on the participa

institute

Joseph Mathieu,Carl Alexander Roosal level (crowdsourcing for a constitution in Iceland, Future Melbourne Wiki, the Slovenian Predlagam.vladi.si, participatory budgeting in Berlin Lichtenberg and the Dutch internetconsultation.nl). The authors place a strong focus on the participatory process and practical experiences. For a better