找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts; Reframing Participat Emanuela Saporito Book 2016 The Author(s) 2016 Conflict Resolution

[复制链接]
查看: 53348|回复: 35
发表于 2025-3-21 19:52:56 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts
副标题Reframing Participat
编辑Emanuela Saporito
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/236/235712/235712.mp4
概述Compares three principal theoretical models of participation in urban planning processes.Presents a case study, the Integrated Intervention Program PII Isola Lunetta in Milan, to investigate model per
丛书名称SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology
图书封面Titlebook: Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts; Reframing Participat Emanuela Saporito Book 2016 The Author(s) 2016 Conflict Resolution
描述This book aims to identify ways of overcoming the limitations of the communicative tradition in understanding participatory spatial planning. Three conceptual models that offer different perspectives on public and civic participation in complex urban planning processes are presented and reviewed: the consensual model, which conceives of planning as a collective decision-making practice geared toward consensus building and conflict resolution; the conflictual model, which views planning as a social mobilization practice addressed at empowerment of marginalized groups; and the trading zone model, which reframes collaborative planning as a coordination activity with respect to practical proposals in the presence of unstable and conflicting rationalities and values. The controversial story of the Integrated Intervention Program “PII Isola Lunetta” in Milan is examined through the interpretative lenses of these models, with detailed interpretation of how each model performs in the field. The book concludes by offering critical reflections on the reframing of participatory spatial planning, highlighting the value of trading zones/trading languages and boundary objects as tools for unders
出版日期Book 2016
关键词Conflict Resolution; Consensual Model; Participatory Spatial Planning; Trading Zone Model; Trading Zones
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30829-6
isbn_softcover978-3-319-30827-2
isbn_ebook978-3-319-30829-6Series ISSN 2191-530X Series E-ISSN 2191-5318
issn_series 2191-530X
copyrightThe Author(s) 2016
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts网络公开度




书目名称Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts被引频次




书目名称Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts被引频次学科排名




书目名称Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts年度引用




书目名称Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts年度引用学科排名




书目名称Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts读者反馈




书目名称Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 23:33:41 | 显示全部楼层
2191-530X field. The book concludes by offering critical reflections on the reframing of participatory spatial planning, highlighting the value of trading zones/trading languages and boundary objects as tools for unders978-3-319-30827-2978-3-319-30829-6Series ISSN 2191-530X Series E-ISSN 2191-5318
发表于 2025-3-22 02:11:52 | 显示全部楼层
Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable ConflictsReframing Participat
发表于 2025-3-22 06:32:30 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 10:34:24 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 15:09:26 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 17:17:35 | 显示全部楼层
Rationalities at Work: How to Read the PII Isola Participatory Process Through Three Different Conceach of the three interpretative groups of theories explored in Chap. . performs when applied to collaborative planning practices as interpretative lenses of a complex reality, and consequently how these three theoretical approaches differ from each other or even are interdependent.
发表于 2025-3-22 23:33:46 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 03:15:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 08:06:11 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-15 01:12
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表