找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law; Worldviews and the W Michael Burkard Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The

[复制链接]
楼主: 投射技术
发表于 2025-3-25 04:54:56 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 11:04:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 11:58:01 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 17:08:55 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 20:51:33 | 显示全部楼层
978-3-319-86995-7The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
发表于 2025-3-26 03:32:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 07:42:15 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 09:55:40 | 显示全部楼层
: Transgressive Women in Tacitus, an example . for showing how the two opposing worldviews, i.e. positivism and relativism, are approaching the same issue from different perspectives. Based on the two opposing worldviews, two approaches to the agrarian question came in conflict. That conflict was especially intense in the nineteent
发表于 2025-3-26 14:43:36 | 显示全部楼层
Transformation oder Transgression?,f Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, the SPS Agreement, itself. In particular, the so-called science-based approach of the SPS Agreement will be examined. The science-based approach of the SPS Agreement is considered as a particular application of the doctrine of separating facts and values in ris
发表于 2025-3-26 18:32:52 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05508-8 and how legal approaches aiming at establishing absolute truth are able to cope with the relative nature of scientific endeavours. May legal bodies designed for establishing objective verdicts ever be capable of coping with the intrinsically non-objective, i.e. relative nature of science?
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-11 00:37
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表