找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law; Worldviews and the W Michael Burkard Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The

[复制链接]
查看: 54049|回复: 53
发表于 2025-3-21 16:24:38 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
书目名称Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law
副标题Worldviews and the W
编辑Michael Burkard
视频videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/236/235381/235381.mp4
概述Uses epistemological concepts to address deadlocked problems in international law, offering an interdisciplinary perspective that combines political economy, international trade law, and philosophy.Ad
丛书名称Philosophy, Public Policy, and Transnational Law
图书封面Titlebook: Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law; Worldviews and the W Michael Burkard Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The
描述This book reveals how conflicting worldviews are at the root of public controversies on policy and trade issues. It highlights the particularly controversial disputes at the level of the World Trade Organization in the case of regulating beef-hormones and GMOs, aiming to show how negotiators of international agreements, members of dispute settlement bodies, and policy makers in general could have recourse to concepts of other disciplines such as epistemology and philosophy in order to address deadlocked legal disputes. Ultimately, the book is a manifesto for independent and critical research. 
出版日期Book 2018
关键词epistemology; trade liberalisation; trade policy; protectionism; SPS Agreement; WTO; agriculture; regulatio
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61067-2
isbn_softcover978-3-319-86995-7
isbn_ebook978-3-319-61067-2Series ISSN 2946-2371 Series E-ISSN 2946-238X
issn_series 2946-2371
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

书目名称Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law网络公开度




书目名称Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law被引频次




书目名称Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law被引频次学科排名




书目名称Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law年度引用




书目名称Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law年度引用学科排名




书目名称Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law读者反馈




书目名称Conflicting Philosophies and International Trade Law读者反馈学科排名




单选投票, 共有 1 人参与投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用户组没有投票权限
发表于 2025-3-21 21:30:24 | 显示全部楼层
Two Concepts of Riske discussed. The first risk concept is rooted in the individualistic and rational philosophy of the Enlightenment and early Capitalism. The second risk concept stems from anti-modernist movements associated with romanticism and the alienation of man from nature.
发表于 2025-3-22 03:14:12 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 04:51:56 | 显示全部楼层
A Promise for Objectivityf Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, the SPS Agreement, itself. In particular, the so-called science-based approach of the SPS Agreement will be examined. The science-based approach of the SPS Agreement is considered as a particular application of the doctrine of separating facts and values in ris
发表于 2025-3-22 11:26:33 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 14:59:37 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-22 20:35:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 00:38:51 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-23 02:42:23 | 显示全部楼层
The Battle for Agriculture Based on the two opposing worldviews, two approaches to the agrarian question came in conflict. That conflict was especially intense in the nineteenth century, were the contours of what Mazoyer and Roudart in . (2006) called ‘the second agricultural revolutions of modern times’ emerged.
发表于 2025-3-23 07:19:33 | 显示全部楼层
Book 2018rnational agreements, members of dispute settlement bodies, and policy makers in general could have recourse to concepts of other disciplines such as epistemology and philosophy in order to address deadlocked legal disputes. Ultimately, the book is a manifesto for independent and critical research. 
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-11 00:35
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表