Titlebook: Clinical Aspects of Dysphasia; Martin L. Albert,Harold Goodglass,Michael P. Alexa Book 1981 Springer-Verlag/Wien 1981 Dysphasie

Indicative

What Approaches to Dysphasia Rehabilitation Are Felt to Be Most Effective?alities, to anomic dysphasia with impairment only in substantive word finding. There is little reason to expect that disorders which vary widely in nature should or can be treated in a similar manner. There are, of course, some general principles which can be applied to any rehabilitative process an

Memorial

Bph773

Afterword: The (Trans)National Poetus speech or in response to word definitions. Right hemiparesis affecting the arm more than the leg, buccofacial apraxia, and ideomotor apraxia of the motorically spared left Upper extremity are common. In the acute stage, if the initial deficit of auditory comprehension is mild, disturbances of wri

PATRI

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94445-6ctively examined the evolution of dysphasia in 69 non-traumatic patients and found that patients seen after 2 months had only a limited possibility of spontaneous recovery compared to patients seen before 2 months. Culton (1969) studied the recovery patterns of 21 dysphasics and concluded that the g

傻瓜

Palgrave Studies in Screenwritingand not force the response (Schuell, Jenkins and Jiménez-Pabón, 1964). But while such principles may guide us in the treatment process, we must have a specific method in mind when sitting across from the patient.

前面

粗鄙的人

窒息

掺和

Desert

Is Dysphasia Rehabilitation Effective?ctively examined the evolution of dysphasia in 69 non-traumatic patients and found that patients seen after 2 months had only a limited possibility of spontaneous recovery compared to patients seen before 2 months. Culton (1969) studied the recovery patterns of 21 dysphasics and concluded that the g