找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Climate Liberalism; Perspectives on Libe Jonathan H. Adler Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen

[复制链接]
楼主: 阿谀奉承
发表于 2025-3-25 06:57:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 10:02:08 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-25 12:55:06 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88228-9ough the transaction costs posed by widespread externalities. But class action lawsuits might offer another way. Drawing on my arguments in “The Conservative Case for Class Actions,” I contend that the private class action bar has many advantages over government regulators and these advantages may extend to climate change litigation.
发表于 2025-3-25 18:10:40 | 显示全部楼层
Climate Change and Class Actions,ough the transaction costs posed by widespread externalities. But class action lawsuits might offer another way. Drawing on my arguments in “The Conservative Case for Class Actions,” I contend that the private class action bar has many advantages over government regulators and these advantages may extend to climate change litigation.
发表于 2025-3-25 21:13:10 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 00:16:19 | 显示全部楼层
M. Aufdermaur,G. L. Bach,H. Mathiesctiveness of any institutional response prevents the production of the necessary comparisons. In the case of climate change, therefore, there are no empirically robust comparative institutional claims that can be made.
发表于 2025-3-26 04:27:02 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 09:32:20 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 15:27:13 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 19:52:54 | 显示全部楼层
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 吾爱论文网 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-8-26 18:31
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表