Titlebook: Climate Liberalism; Perspectives on Libe Jonathan H. Adler Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen

逃避现实

M. Aufdermaur,G. L. Bach,H. Mathieshange. It argues that non-ideal comparisons between alternatives are necessary to judge the likely ‘real-world’ consequences of adopting different policy regimes to address the climate change dilemma, but that the global character of the problem and the timescales required to judge the relative effe

上坡

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-88228-9 especially about what detailed knowledge regulators have about the impacts of climate change, and what the proper role of government and policy is in responding to those impacts. However, I explain why the SCC-based approach need not actually have these problematic presuppositions as well as why SC

放逐

Climate Liberalism978-3-031-21108-9Series ISSN 2662-6470 Series E-ISSN 2662-6489

ESPY

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21108-9pollution; classical liberalism; property rights; climate change; free market environmentalism; nuisance;

Conducive

受伤

Introduction,rights and decentralized authority. While classical-liberal thinkers have explained how competitive markets and property rights encourage efficiency, innovation, and sustainable utilization, less attention has been paid to the more difficult environmental challenges that have come to the fore in the

TAP

Flounder

巩固

integral

Common Law Tort as a Transitional Regulatory Regime: A New Perspective on Climate Change Litigationncompletely understood, health and safety risks, common law tort liability holds out the potential for a dynamic regulatory response, one that creates incentives to develop additional information about potential risks and stimulates innovation to mitigate and/or adapt to these risks.In this temporal