找回密码
 To register

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

Titlebook: Climate Change and Individual Responsibility; Agency, Moral Diseng Wouter Peeters,Andries Smet,Sigrid Sterckx Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan,

[复制链接]
楼主: bankrupt
发表于 2025-3-25 04:46:10 | 显示全部楼层
Understanding the Motivational Gap,uated with wealth accumulation and consumption. Climate change challenges the inviolable status conferred to these materialistic freedoms, requiring emitters to resort to moral disengagement in order to be able to maintain a consumptive lifestyle without having to accept moral responsibility for the resultant harms.
发表于 2025-3-25 08:35:57 | 显示全部楼层
Introduction, to identify the complex problem of climate change as an important moral problem; and second, people can employ psychological mechanisms of moral disengagement, which allow them to evade individual responsibility for the consequences of their materialistic pursuits. The main aim of this book is to expand upon the second explanation.
发表于 2025-3-25 12:22:22 | 显示全部楼层
Climate Change, Human Rights and Moral Responsibility,ties of individual emitters have been underestimated because important doubts exist about the agency of individuals in complex global dynamics such as climate change. We contrast this view with the observation that people can psychologically reconstruct their contribution to climate change, in order to evade moral responsibility for it.
发表于 2025-3-25 17:27:16 | 显示全部楼层
Addressing the Motivational Gap and Tackling Moral Disengagement,f the underlying reasons for deploying mechanisms of moral disengagement can be reduced by encouraging people to evaluate and redefine their self-interested motives or by addressing the perceived demandingness of morality. Third, we argue that the propensity for moral disengagement should itself be tackled as well.
发表于 2025-3-25 21:26:19 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 01:01:18 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 05:20:14 | 显示全部楼层
Practical Pricing and the Airline Industryties of individual emitters have been underestimated because important doubts exist about the agency of individuals in complex global dynamics such as climate change. We contrast this view with the observation that people can psychologically reconstruct their contribution to climate change, in order to evade moral responsibility for it.
发表于 2025-3-26 10:53:19 | 显示全部楼层
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68845-7f the underlying reasons for deploying mechanisms of moral disengagement can be reduced by encouraging people to evaluate and redefine their self-interested motives or by addressing the perceived demandingness of morality. Third, we argue that the propensity for moral disengagement should itself be tackled as well.
发表于 2025-3-26 12:52:28 | 显示全部楼层
发表于 2025-3-26 19:31:30 | 显示全部楼层
8楼
 关于派博传思  派博传思旗下网站  友情链接
派博传思介绍 公司地理位置 论文服务流程 影响因子官网 SITEMAP 大讲堂 北京大学 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
发展历史沿革 期刊点评 投稿经验总结 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系数 清华大学 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
|Archiver|手机版|小黑屋| 派博传思国际 ( 京公网安备110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-6-30 15:23
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博传思   京公网安备110108008328 版权所有 All rights reserved
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表