Titlebook: Climate Change and Individual Responsibility; Agency, Moral Diseng Wouter Peeters,Andries Smet,Sigrid Sterckx Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan,

bankrupt

书目名称Climate Change and Individual Responsibility影响因子(影响力)




书目名称Climate Change and Individual Responsibility影响因子(影响力)学科排名




书目名称Climate Change and Individual Responsibility网络公开度




书目名称Climate Change and Individual Responsibility网络公开度学科排名




书目名称Climate Change and Individual Responsibility被引频次




书目名称Climate Change and Individual Responsibility被引频次学科排名




书目名称Climate Change and Individual Responsibility年度引用




书目名称Climate Change and Individual Responsibility年度引用学科排名




书目名称Climate Change and Individual Responsibility读者反馈




书目名称Climate Change and Individual Responsibility读者反馈学科排名

即席

Climate Change, Human Rights and Moral Responsibility,posed by observed and projected climatic changes, climate change is conceptualized as a moral harm. We explore how the burdens involved in remedying the problem should be allocated, focusing on the principle of moral responsibility that plays a central role in common-sense morality. The responsibili

供过于求

一回合

Understanding the Motivational Gap,r moral framework to capture climate change as an important moral problem — remains incomplete, since individuals can effectively be identified as morally responsible for their luxury emissions. Second, the complexity of climate change and doubts about individual agency are overly emphasized, enabli

淘气

Addressing the Motivational Gap and Tackling Moral Disengagement,luxury emissions, and to accordingly acknowledge their remedial responsibility for tackling climate change. First, emitters’ motivation can be increased by enhancing their moral judgement on the basis of common-sense morality, or by invoking alternative moral values. Second, the motivational force o

模仿

Conclusion,arding people’s rights and responsibilities does not imply that we are unable to make any judgement at all. On the basis of moral responsibility for their luxury emissions, emitters can at least be assigned remedial responsibility for climate change. The arguments usually invoked to support exonerat

模仿

AVOW

有害

Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2015

Injunction

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230294776d, response to it is characterized by inaction at all levels. Hence, the severity of climate change and its consequences does not appear to sufficiently motivate people to tackle it. There are two complementary explanations for this motivational gap: first, our moral judgement system might be unable