Titlebook: Can Theories be Refuted?; Essays on the Duhem- Sandra G. Harding Book 1976 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1976 falsificat

要求比…更好

Duhem, Quine and A New Empiricism,ferent and even conflicting currents in subsequent philosophy of science. On a superficial reading, it seems to be an expression of what later came to be called deductivist and instrumentalist analyses of scientific theory. Duhem’s very definition of physical theory, put forward early in the book, i

断断续续

Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, integrity demanded that one must desist from unproven utterances and minimize, even in thought, the gap between speculation and established knowledge. The proving power of the intellect or the senses was questioned by the sceptics more than two thousand years ago; but they were browbeaten into conf

旧病复发

Duhem, Quine and A New Empiricism,ferent and even conflicting currents in subsequent philosophy of science. On a superficial reading, it seems to be an expression of what later came to be called deductivist and instrumentalist analyses of scientific theory. Duhem’s very definition of physical theory, put forward early in the book, is the quintessence of instrumentalism:

下边深陷

Multisensory Experiences in Digital Media,A scientist, whether theorist or experimenter, puts forward statements, or systems of statements, and tests them step by step. In the field of the empirical sciences, more particularly, he constructs hypotheses, or systems of theories, and tests them against experience by observation and experiment.

石墨

Why Shading Matters along Contours,This paper offers a refutation of P. Duhem’s thesis that the . of an isolated empirical hypothesis H as an . is .. Its central contentions are the following:

Dungeon

conformity

Nathan E. Bunderson PhD,Jeffrey Bingham PhDIn his book ., Duhem denied the feasibility of crucial experiments in physics. Said he:

Enrage

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3267-2Let us now use the material of the [earlier sections of ‘Against Method’] to throw light on the following features of contemporary empiricism: first, the distinction between a context of discovery and a context of justification; second, the distinction between observational terms and theoretical terms; third, the problem of incommensurability.

猛烈责骂

alleviate

The Duhemian Argument,This paper offers a refutation of P. Duhem’s thesis that the . of an isolated empirical hypothesis H as an . is .. Its central contentions are the following: